2026 Georgia Primary
Candidate Endorsement Process
-
This page covers the 2026 Georgia primary and nonpartisan elections. Due to timing, endorsements are limited to contested primaries and nonpartisan races decided on May 19. General election endorsements will be considered later.
-
All nonpartisan races (including Georgia Supreme Court and judicial races) are final on May 19 and not part of the primary process.
-
The endorsement team consists of Indivisible Cobb volunteers who selected races particularly relevant to Cobb County residents.
-
Invited candidates completed a questionnaire on key issues. This page includes their responses; where candidates did not respond, links are provided for independent research.
-
Key dates:
-
Voter registration deadline: April 20
-
Early voting begins: April 27
-
Election Day: May 19
-
Voter status can be checked online via the GA My Voter Page
-
-
Public Service Commission (PSC) races: All Georgia voters may vote in every PSC election, regardless of district.
-
Endorsement voting process:
-
Conducted via SurveyMars (anonymous, one vote per IP address)
-
Participation is optional per race - you may skip any poll
-
-
Endorsement rules:
-
Only candidates who responded to the questionnaire are eligible, with one exception (Miracle Rankin due to timing/significance)
-
Candidates must receive at least 60% support and meet a minimum participation threshold
-
If participation is too low, no endorsement will be made
-
-
Due to time constraints, voting will be conducted only through this online poll - no alternate voting options will be available
-
Once endorsements are made, the group will focus outreach and volunteer efforts on those races. Members are always free to support any candidate of their choosing, regardless of Indivisible Cobb group endorsements.
-
Please note: Indivisible Cobb's endorsement polls will close at 11:59pm ET on Saturday, April 25
Cobb County School Board - Post 4
Susan McCartney (D)
Website: No known website
*Susan did not respond to our survey.
Background and Experience Q: Briefly introduce yourself. (Key background and relevant experience - not a full biography.) MG: I am a parent of a third grader in Cobb schools, co-President of her PTA, and on the board of Directors for regional and district PTA. I am a small business owner of almost 17 years, and I’ve been heavily involved in state and local level advocacy for gun violence prevention and strengthening our public schools. I’m a two-time candidate for the state house. And my wife and I have lived in Cobb County for 23 years. Q: Do you have children currently enrolled in Cobb County schools? MG: yes Q: What is your current profession? MG: Owner of Website Development Company Q: What college or university did you attend? MG: Rice University Q: What professional or volunteer experience has prepared you to serve on the Cobb County School Board? MG: I’ve served on several executive boards, including board of directors for Georgia Highland Medical Services (a community health services provider in North Georgia whose largest patient population is Latino and immigrant communities), board of directors for GALEO Impact Fund (an organization that supports Latino candidates running for state and local offices), board of directors for East Cobb County Council of PTAs (serving as the Scholarship chair for six East Cobb high schools), and executive board for Keheley Elementary PTA (serving as President and Treasurer). In my previous job, I was product manager of Business Internet and Web Hosting products for EarthLink, then a billion-dollar company. I had P&L responsibility for a $1.5 million marketing budget for multiple product lines. I’m currently a business owner of a web development business that has been in operation for almost 17 years. I’m a co-founder of Cobb Community Care Coalition, a volunteer organization of caregivers, educators and community members who has been active within Cobb County Schools, especially within the school board, helping stakeholders advocate for their children and mobilizing support for this advocacy. We have been part of helping change graduation policy to prevent discrimination against students in special education, winning accommodations for children with IEPs, ending the $50 million basketball arena project, and pushing for support for summer lunch programs aimed at students who require food assistance during the summer months. And I served on the funding committee for Community Foundation of Greater Atlanta in which we reviewed applications and approved grants to provide tens of thousands of dollars to organizations providing support to Latino and immigrant families in the Fair Oaks area of Marietta, including organizations embedded in Cobb elementary schools in the area.
Core Education Policy Positions: Public Education Funding Q: 1) What is your approach to budgeting and fiscal oversight for Cobb County Schools? 2) How will you ensure funds are directed toward classrooms, teachers, and student support services? MG: We should be open and transparent with the community in our budgeting and in how we make decisions that impact our classrooms. That means we adhere to our own policies, review and update policies that are not keeping with accounting best practices and provide ample review time before we take votes. Too often, the board takes votes the same day that something is discussed without any engagement with the community or our educators on the effects. We need to also acknowledge that a large portion of money spent in our district (SPLOST funding) is controlled by an F&T committee made up of people with political connections to the board. Several appointees served as political advisors to board members previous to their appointment. My appointees will not be people with whom I owe political favors – they will be people who are as deeply engaged in the community as I am and who have experience serving on boards such as this. While we have a large budget, we don’t have infinite resources especially when the Department of Education is being dismantled and healthcare for our disabled students is being threatened. That’s why it is important we don’t spend our money on things like an unneeded basketball arena, unproven technology like Iggy machines, and on law firms to redistrict our county based solely on race.
Teacher Recruitment & Retention Q: 1) What policies would you support to recruit and retain high-quality teachers and staff? 2) What are your views on teacher pay and working conditions? MG: An area that Cobb does well in is in teacher pay and in professional development opportunities through Georgia’s Best. I know several teachers at my school that have taken advantage of the program. Many educators I speak with talk about the unmatched pay, including those in neighboring districts. I support continuing this to retain our staff. Mentoring programs address teacher retention among new teachers by providing the support that teachers need to feel effective in the classroom. I support our relationships with KSU in mentoring their teaching candidates to prepare them for classrooms around the state and here in Cobb. There is room for improvement especially as it relates to working conditions. Georgia ranks near the bottom of states in per-pupil spending and our board likes to boast we have the lowest per-pupil spending in Metro Atlanta. That’s not a brag. That speaks to a deficiency in resources in the classroom to support our educators and puts more on their plate. An example of this was when our second-grade students across the county were given math workbooks that were filled with errors to the point they were unusable. Schools had to pivot and use their own resources until the county finally sent updated books in the second semester. But not enough were sent – room parents and staff had to copy books to make sure every student had one to use. I dislike that we have culture wars in public education and that our district plays into them. Taking actions that cause distrust among some parents with educators and media specialists only serves to strain parent-teacher relationships which leads to poor student outcomes. I’ve heard from current employees who are retiring early because of this and others who would join the teaching profession but instead are pursuing other avenues. As someone who works constantly within our schools to increase engagement between educators and parents to establish trust necessary for active collaboration, this idea that we have to micromanage classrooms is foreign to me.
Student Safety Q: 1) What measures do you support to ensure student and staff safety? 2) What is your position on School Resource Officers and restorative discipline practices? MG: This is an issue that I have been intimately involved with over my lifetime. I’ve had family members and friends killed by gun violence, including a cousin who was a junior in high school who took his own life with an unsecured firearm. Unfortunately, our discussions on school safety are too narrow at the state and local level. The focus seems to be more on hardening buildings as opposed to keeping firearms out of the hands of children and being trusted adults that can intervene when our students are in a moment of crisis. More has to be done within the state legislature, specifically when it comes to safe storage of firearms. Even states like Texas and Florida have laws requiring that firearms be secured around children, but Georgia does not. Studies have shown that this single measure can make a huge impact in reducing gun violence, especially around suicides and unintentional shootings. I would support making this one of our top legislative priorities as well as joining a resolution with 40+ mayors around the state who call on our legislature to act. But absent legislation, our district can do a lot more. I’ve been advocating to our board to get their support on initiatives to educate parents and community members around the issue of safe storage. Being such a large district and so embedded in our communities, we can have an outsized impact on reducing the likelihood that our students can get access to firearms. We can offer safety materials in our welcome packets at the beginning of the year and have community/school events where we offer information and free security devices that we can get through partnerships with local organizations. These organizations have been offering to do these within our schools for years with pushback from the district even though they are nonpartisan and they are free. With respect to other measures, I support the investments to have an ID system to get into our schools and the training around them. I know the state just passed a bill requiring metal detectors – I am generally personally against these especially as part of a blanket unfunded mandate. I have yet to see any data showing the effectiveness of our vapor wake canine program, especially with its huge initial and ongoing expenses. And I am vehemently against the millions we have invested in a secretive program that gives student data to a military intelligence organization to profile our kids. With respect to SROs, I am concerned about the numbers I see when it comes to the disparities in punishment especially with our Black and Latino students and our students with disabilities. The numbers I have seen are that Black students are 4 times more likely to be punished with suspension or expulsion and that our students with disabilities reflect almost 30% of suspensions and expulsions despite being 15% of the student population. I know from individual cases that issues have escalated needlessly due to the actions of some resource officers. And community groups have told me that they gave great relationships with every law enforcement entity in the county – except for one, Cobb County schools police. I am a big proponent that we need to involve the community in ALL of our discussions on school safety, including the desire for things like metal detectors or school resource officers. And if the community wants these officers, then they must be trained on restorative discipline. Often disruptive behavior happens because we have not met the needs of a student. Whether that is a student with disabilities having an unmet IEP or a student not getting the help they need to become a proficient reader, when we meet their needs, we can keep them engaged in the classroom.
Curriculum & Academic Standards Q: 1) What guiding principles will you use when evaluating curriculum decisions? 2) How should the district handle challenges to books and instructional materials? MG: I’ll first say that the way our current board operates is to largely be hands off with those curriculum decisions until the end of the process when the Superintendent and our chief academic officer bring their recommendations before the board. We should be involved in the beginning especially in making sure those principles are being used by our experts in their evaluation. Those principles include: 1. Does it follow our state standards and our vision for the district? 2. Have we engaged all stakeholders and made sure that diverse perspectives are included in the process? Are there any community concerns that need to be addressed? Is it culturally relevant to the diverse set of students we have throughout the county? 4. Has it been vetted independently? Our district likes to talk about doing things on its own aka “the Cobb way”, and I’d much rather us take into what has worked well in other similar districts and consider the recommendations from independent sources. 5. How will we roll out the curriculum and how will we determine the effectiveness over time? 6. Have we addressed how we will support our educators through professional learning and any materials they may need? With respect to challenges, it is important to note that there has not been a single parent challenge to a book as part of this book banning spree initiated by the district several years ago. Cobb went outside of established board and district policies to ban and shadow ban over 50 books throughout the district. The district uses a secretive internal process with unknown staff members vetting book decisions including the use of input from radical organizations like Libs of TikTok. I will work with other board members to end this process immediately, restore books challenged outside of our established process, and ensure that future challenges go through a process in which a parent must initiate the challenge locally with books vetted by trained media specialists. We know that this same process is being used to limit discussions in the classroom. An independent organization released open records showing that internal challenges were made during discussions on slavery. Our students must be able to have robust discussions in order to hear new perspectives and build critical thinking skills.
Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Q: How will you ensure that all students - regardless of race, disability status, gender identity, or socioeconomic background - feel safe and supported in Cobb County schools? MG: We start by saying it in our policies and expecting the tone from the board and Superintendent to reflect it in everything we say and do. It was just over a year ago that the board voted 4-3 to remove “equity” from our mission and the Superintendent said he was happy to sign the president’s anti-diversity pledge on day 1. It’s no secret that our book bans are rooted in removing books based on race and gender identity, and I have been at the forefront of fighting against these bans. I’ve stood beside our students at board meetings when they have come to speak about how they feel the district is trying to erase their identity when it bans books with characters that reflect their lived experiences. Our anti-bullying program is inadequate in addressing the fact that many instances of bullying are based on the identity of students. We should have a robust program that reflects that and teaches our students to stand up for their classmates when bullied for identity rather than put the onus on students to just walk away. And we can say we are for something, but students want to see our values in action. Representation on the board is important. Our students are over 26% Latino, yet we have never had a Latino member of the school board. Of the over 900 school board members in the state of Georgia, only two are Latino. My election to the board would show our students that our board is reflective of our student population, especially just a few years after our board and our state legislature passed a map that diluted our voting power.
Student Mental Health Q: 1) What role should the district play in supporting student mental health? 2) What policies would you advocate to strengthen counseling and behavioral health resources? MG: Studies show that half of our students have an unmet need for mental health care and that only half of schools feel effective in providing these services. Children spend a significant amount of time in the classroom, so we have an opportunity to be part of early identification of mental illnesses and providing interventions whether that is school-based services by trained professionals or connections to more intensive resources in the community. While Cobb does better than the state-average, our student to counselor ratio is still well above the ASCA-recommended 250:1 ratio. The state funds at 450:1 and Cobb is around 387:1. I would advocate that we make state funding of the 250:1 ratio a legislative priority and work to do better in funding more counselors within our county. Cobb also went away from the ASCA counseling model in favor of its own certification. When we move away from national models with research-based best practices, we leave out key components, especially around equity and systemic advocacy. I would advocate for a return to full alignment with ASCA and adherence to nationally recognized standards. And I would support equity-centered policies, culturally responsive practices, and restorative approaches to discipline so that all students – especially those historically underserved – have equitable access to counseling and mental health resources. Ultimately the role of the board is to set a clear vision and standard. By anchoring policy in national frameworks like ASCA, we ensure that all students receive comprehensive, equitable, high-quality counseling and behavioral health support, and that our district remains aligned with the highest standards.
Governance & Leadership Q: What do you believe is the proper role of a school board member? MG: We have three main responsibilities: to hire, evaluate, and manage the Superintendent; to pass a budget for the district, and to set the vision and direction for our public schools through sound policy and approval of curriculum. However, many on our current board believe that their role is limited and have largely ceded authority to the Superintendent. My view is that we are elected officials and answer to the people, to caregivers, educators, and other community stakeholders. We should be deeply embedded in the community engaging frequently to understand the issues that our families are facing. In doing so, we can set good policy that addresses these issues and ensure that the Superintendent is following them. Q: How will you work collaboratively with other board members who may hold different viewpoints? MG: I have the experience to do this because I’ve done it in every capacity that I have had. In my role in our public schools, I work with board members and parents who have a wide variety of viewpoints. It is important to set an environment in which we welcome the sharing of views, work towards the building of consensus, and respect the occasional hearty debate. In the same way, we can respect that each board member is elected by a majority of people within their post and can best advocate for their individual communities. As such, we should not have rules that limit the discussion of items based on majority-rules. If a member has an issue relevant to their community, we should be able to discuss that in public, even if the majority ends up ultimately voting against that member’s desires. Q: How will you build trust with families, teachers, and community stakeholders? MG: My advocacy and work within our public schools has gone a long way towards already building that trust with these groups. I co-founded a group called Cobb Community Care Coalition built around the foundation that we support community members in need – not just because something affects us personally. Families in our schools have seen the way I live my values in the way I bring people together to plan events and programs to help our students and educators and in the way I speak up for those in the community harmed by our district. Our teachers have seen me support them in the classroom and work to strengthen relationships between them and caregivers. And I will maintain that trust by continuing to engage them as a board member and to advocate for them within the district.
Campaign Priorities Q: Please list your three (3) top priorities for serving on the Cobb County School Board: MG: 1) Actively engage with the community so we can better respond to the needs of our families and more effectively advocate for our students. 2) Improve student safety and well-being by recognizing that parents, teachers, and community leaders play vital roles in promoting a safe learning environment and should be part of our safety discussions. 3) Change the tone of our board leadership to be more collaborative and takes partisanship out of the decisions we make. Q: Why is your top priority the most urgent for students and families in your district? MG: We have a number of challenges in education and we have to have the pulse of our families to understand how we meet those challenges. An example is with literacy which I believe is critically important. Our CCRPI scores show we experienced a significant decline, especially at the elementary level which followed stagnant or small declines in Milestones reading scores earlier in the year. Our district responded by saying the scores are meaningless after years of using these scores to say that we are outperforming surrounding counties. But those of us engaged in our schools know the uneven rollout of the science of reading and know the impact that is having directly in the classroom. We were slow to roll out science of reading as a district, which meant that our individual schools had to step in. Those of us with strong foundations (and funding) were able to fund these locally so that our students would not fall behind. But those schools without these resources could not. We must have a plan to address these declining scores and that requires engagement with the community to ensure that we are making curriculum choices that address the needs of the entire district.
Community Engagement & Accountability Q: How will you remain accessible and accountable to parents, students, educators, and community members? MG: As a leader within local and regional PTA, I’ve consistently made myself accessible and accountable to the community. In that role, I have established long-standing relationships with parents and educators. Even as a candidate now, I have continued to be a part of PTA to the extent that I am allowed and will continue to be when elected to the board. I’m a big believer in town halls and will conduct them not only in my post, but throughout the entire county. It is my hope that other board members would join me in being a part of these especially when it comes to making big decisions in the district like student safety and the budget. I’ve held many town halls, forums, and educational workshops over the last several years, including an educational advocacy workshop in 2023 that informed current board members of state level funding priorities. I will also work to undo changes to how the public interacts with us at our monthly meetings. I will push to restore the airing of public comment, make it easier for students and educators to attend and give comment, and allow for interaction between board members and commenters. Q: How do you plan to engage with historically underrepresented communities in Cobb County? MG: Over the years, I have been fortunate to establish relationships with leaders from diverse areas of the county, including faith leaders from Muslim and Jewish communities, advocates from immigrant communities, and community organizers from largely Black and Latino neighborhoods. I will use those connections, as well as relationships with the other board members, to meet these community members where they are and hear their needs. I am also proud that my campaign is filled with people from historically underrepresented communities. My leadership team is diverse as is the volunteer team that we have assembled. It is reflective of my intention to be a board member for ALL areas of Cobb County, not just Post 4.
Endorsements & Transparency Q: What organizations or individuals have endorsed your campaign? MG: I don’t have any organizational endorsements at this time, but I have pending applications with Georgia Conservation Voters, Cobb County Association of Educators, and Everytown for Gun Safety. GCV and Everytown have endorsed me in the past. Prominent individuals who have donated to my campaign include former Governor Roy Barnes, former school board member Charisse Davis, current state representative Lisa Campbell, current school board candidate Jennifer Susko, and Watching the Funds-Cobb founder Heather Tolley-Bauer. Q: Do you accept campaign contributions from corporate PACs, Big Tech, cryptocurrency interests, or major political advocacy organizations such as AIPAC? Why or why not? MG: I have never received or solicited campaign contributions from corporate PACs, Big Tech, or cryptocurrency interests. Many of our current board members and elected officials do accept these types of donations, especially from entities that do business with the district. This is the root of the corruption we see within our local board, especially with such a large budget and being the largest employer in the county. Political advocacy organizations in which I have accepted donations in the past are from Georgia Conservation Voters, United Campus Workers of Georgia, Everytown for Gun Safety, Planned Parenthood, and Pa’lante – an organization that supports Latino candidates at the state and local level. I view these organizations differently because I already do advocacy work within these organizations which makes for natural alignment in our values. However, I would never compromise my values in order to win an endorsement or an endorsement contribution for my campaign. It is important to note that I have received 100 contributions to my campaign so far, every single one from an individual. 97% of them are from people living in Cobb or the surrounding counties. And in total, we have raised just over $20,500. Q: How much cash-on-hand does your campaign currently have? MG: $10,645 Q: Please list your five largest contributors. MG: $3,300 from Governor Roy Barnes, $3,300 from Michael Tafelski, $1,500 from Lennert Smeets, $1,500 from Heather Tolley-Bauer, $1,000 from Mike St. Louis / $1,000 from William Atkins Q: Provide links to any pledges you have signed at the request of other organizations. MG: Only GCV: https://gcvoters.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/2026-GCV-Local-Candidate-Questionnaire-Docx-Version.pdf.
Cobb County Solicitor General
Makia Metzger (D - Incumbent)
Website: Makia Metzger
makiametzger4cobbsolicitor@gmail.com
Lived in Cobb County: 30+ years
Background and Experience: Q: Briefly introduce yourself. (Key background and relevant experience - not a full biography.) MM: Proud immigrant, born in Sierra Leone, I came to the U.S. with my family over 35 years ago, just before a decade long civil war. That history shaped my commitment to service. A 30+ year Cobb resident and product of its schools, I graduated summa cum laude from Georgia State Univ. and earned my law degree from the Univ. of Georgia. I'm married to a teacher, and I am a proud mom of two sons, one who is currently at Georgia Tech Univ. Prosecuted cases for 20 years and now serve as Cobb County's Solicitor General. I'm honored to be Cobb County's first female and first African American Solicitor General, serving with purpose, compassion and a commitment to safer communities. Received the following since taking office: Solicitor General of the Year-GABCO (Georgia Assoc. of Black County Officials) Rotary Club West Metro Rookie of the Year Woman of Achievement Award by LiveSafe Resources, Inc. Q: What legal experience has prepared you to serve as Cobb County Solicitor General? MM: With over 20 years as a prosecutor, I've served as an Assistant Solicitor General and an Assistant District Attorney, including 14 years in Fulton and time in Paulding, before leading as Cobb Solicitor General for the past 3+ years. I've tried hundreds of cases and prosecuted thousands, building deep experience in criminal law. Today, I oversee an $8 million budget, lead a team of about 70, and manage a caseload exceeding 35,000. I'm proud to run a balanced budget, efficient office, with no backlogs and to champion consistent, fair, and respectful justice for every case. Q: Have you previously worked as a prosecutor, public defender, or in criminal defense? Please describe. MM: Yes. In law school I worked with the Legal Aid Clinic and have been a prosecutor for 20 years. Q: What is your current profession? MM: Lawyer, prosecutor, public servant, Cobb Solicitor General
Philosophy of Justice: Q: What does “justice” mean to you in the context of misdemeanor prosecution? MM: Justice means fairness you can see and trust. Its ensuring people in similar circumstances are treated the same, with consistent and equitable outcomes. It means prosecutors who listen carefully weighing both sides before making decisions and who value transparency through open file policies, providing discovery without unnecessary barriers. At its core, justice is about consistency, accountability, and respect for every person and every case. Q: How do you balance public safety with fairness and proportionality in sentencing? MM: We balance public safety with fairness by evaluating every case individually so people can make informed choices. Nonviolent young adults (17-25) with a limited criminal history may enter our Smart Choices Program, earning a second chance without a lasting record. In cases like domestic violence and DUI, we prioritize treatment that addresses root causes alongside accountability. Through accountability courts and diversion options, we protect the community while promoting proportional, rehabilitative outcomes. Q: What role should diversion programs play in the Solicitor General’s Office? MM: Smart choices and our Domestic violence court are both integral programs in addressing root causes of crime and addressing recidivism.
Policy & Operational Priorities: Q: What types of diversion or accountability courts do you support expanding or implementing? MM: Smart Choices, Domestic violence court & DUI Court Q: How will you measure the success of diversion programs? MM: Our successes are measured by the percentage of individuals that recidivate. Q: What is your position on cash bail for misdemeanor offenses? MM: All misdemeanants should have the opportunity to a bond. In misdemeanor cases, every misdemeanant has a reasonable bond to enable them to get out of jail. The magistrate court judges have complete discretion in this regard. Q: How should pretrial decisions balance risk, fairness, and public safety? MM: Full and complete investigations should enable good pretrial decisions that promote fairness and public safety. Our investigative team is organized and highly trained to complete and retrieve data to assist our solicitors in making the best decisions on our cases. Q: How should the office approach prosecution of low-level offenses such as marijuana possession, traffic offenses, or ordinance violations? Are there offenses you believe should be deprioritized? Why or why not? MM: In terms of managing high caseloads, we have a traffic and ordinance division to manage those low-level offenses and enable citizens to resolve their cases either prior to coming to court or on the day their case is scheduled. While case management and efficiency are a priority as we don't want unnecessary backlogs, we look at driver's histories and GCIC's to ensure we are not making offers that endanger the public's safety. Q: How will you ensure victims of crime receive meaningful support and communication throughout the legal process? MM: We comply the Victim Rights Bill which means we notify victims of all upcoming court dates and offers. We work closely with LiveSafe Resources, Inc. and provide other resources through LiveSafe like temporary housing, amenities, transportation and other necessities. By supporting the systems that support survivors of domestic violence, we in turn support our victims. Q: How will your office consider the potential immigration consequences of misdemeanor charges and plea agreements? Most individuals who have ICE holds are removed from our jurisdiction. We do not inquire into immigration status during pretrials to avoid undue bias toward the accused. Every individual is treated equally at their pre-trial. We cannot give legal advice to individuals as that would be unethical; however, we refer them to the circuit defender's office to gain proper guidance and representation. The defense attorney generally drives the resolution in such matters as they are privy to the needs of their client. Immigrant victims of domestic can apply for status once their case is complete and we facilitate that process with the assistance of their immigration attorney. Q: Will you commit to publishing data on charging decisions, plea agreements, diversion participation, and sentencing outcomes? MM: We don't have every single case that goes through State Court however the State Court Clerk is the official record keeper of every case in our jurisdiction, and we utilize their record keeping data for accuracy. We would need additional resources to provide precise data for the County through additional personnel and technology which is currently not allocated for in our budget. The Open Records Act is a useful mechanism with which we fully comply. We do however provide rough data on Smart Justice completions, bench warrants disposed of, and the number of trials and cases we have logged in our system. Q: How will you ensure transparency and accountability within the office? MM: We have Friday Fundamentals and ongoing training for prosecutors to learn the case law updates; we have an internal case management system and experienced deputies who oversee their litigation teams. We have monthly meetings and do about 3 townhalls a year to discuss our statistics, innovation and challenges with our community.
Office Leadership & Culture Q: How will you recruit, train, and retain prosecutors and staff? MM: With the recent successful bi-partisan passage of HB 858, we have raised the living wage for incoming licensed attorneys which makes our office competitive and hopefully a desirable place to work, we have a legal intern program for law students with all our GA law schools, we have Friday Fundamentals (training), a spring 2 day training for all our attorneys (that we sponsor in Cobb) and several conferences throughout the year. All training is free and travel reimbursement is included. Due to the fact that the private sector pays substantially more, we cannot compete as a government entity with the private sector but as part of our hiring practice that newly hired attorneys commit to two years of public service. Our goal is to have a good diverse group of senior attorneys and new attorneys as that also helps maintain a fiscally sound budget. Q: What policies will you implement to prevent racial or socioeconomic disparities in prosecution outcomes? MM: We recently sponsored the Carl Vinson Implicit Bias training for our whole office which covered many pertinent topics of discussion dealing with bias. All employees sign codes of conduct and professionalism that align with our values of non-discriminatory conduct and our expectations.
Community Engagement & Accountability Q: How will you remain accessible and accountable to Cobb County residents? MM: We have numerous town halls sponsored by our office as well as the County, we have a newsletter and website that is open and accessible to public. I am easily accessible through direct contact via email. Q: How do you plan to collaborate with community organizations, law enforcement, and defense counsel? MM: As a member of numerous organizations (Kiwanis, Rotary, Cobb Chamber, GAWL, Cobb Dems), I try to attend their local meetings and sign up for their emails. As a Cobb bar member, I interface with the defense bar quite often and I am always readily available to discuss cases via phone or in person. I have met in person with all our local enforcement leaders, and we have visited them during roll call with goodies and case law updates. We hope to continue interfacing with all our community partners. Q: How will you build trust in communities that may feel over-policed or underserved? MM: Town halls are a very good way to communicate with our communities. We had 4 townhalls across the County last year and have our first one scheduled in May this year. We hire a wide variety of individuals that bring talent, perspective and diversity from all over Cobb County. We have food drives with Must, coat drives with Haven for Hope, reading and career day initiatives, book drives with Cobb Collaborative, a free summer mock trial for middle schoolers, community runs for charitable causes and a podcast called Smart Justice Works to discuss all things Cobb and public safety and a record restriction and ongoing Second chance desk with the Georgia Justice Project to offer meaningful second chances to those in need.
Campaign Priorities Q: Please list your three (3) top priorities if elected Solicitor General: MM: 1. Expanding and Improving our Smart Choices Program 2. Supporting survivors of Domestic Violence by educating the public, providing safety for our most vulnerable communities & sponsoring our only organization in Cobb that provides resources to survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault, i.e., LiveSafe Resources, Inc. 3. Reducing recidivism through innovative and meaningful accountability initiatives & partnerships. Q: Why is your top priority the most urgent for Cobb County residents? MM: My top priority is urgent because it directly impacts the safety and well-being of our community today and in the future. By strengthening the Smart Choices program, we give young people a real opportunity to change course before a mistake defines their lives. At the same time, supporting survivors of domestic violence by partnering with the organizations that serve them helps break cycles of harm and ensures they have the resources to rebuild safely. Ultimately, reducing recidivism through effective accountability programs and public education is how we keep Cobb County safer, stronger, and more just.
Endorsements & Transparency Q: What organizations or individuals have endorsed your campaign? MM: None yet Q: Do you accept campaign contributions from corporate PACs, Big Tech, cryptocurrency interests, or major political advocacy organizations such as AIPAC? Why or why not? MM: It hasn't been an issue in a small county race as my position doesn't influence foreign policy. Q: How much cash-on-hand does your campaign currently have? MM: $31,965 Q: Please list your five largest contributors. MM: Gov. Roy Barnes, Holly Waltman (defense attorney), Joe Eckler, Dr. Carmen Klass, Ajay Ganapathy Q: Provide links to any pledges you have signed at the request of other organizations. MM: No link but signed a Cobb Dems form indicating my values are aligned with protecting women's rights (currently subscribe to Planned Parenthood monthly), civil rights & LGBTQ+ (subscribe to HRC monthly) communities as well as our immigrant communities.
Georgia State House District 37

Background and Experience: Q: Briefly introduce yourself. (Key background and relevant experience - not a full biography.) GB: Graham Bowers is a lifelong Georgia resident, technology leader, and community‑focused problem‑solver with a strong record of leadership, service, and civic engagement. A self‑taught application developer, IT specialist, and AI consultant, Graham has built his career designing solutions, managing complex systems, and leading with accountability and clarity—bringing a practical, results‑driven perspective to public service. He is a member of the Leadership Perimeter Class of 2026 and was nominated for Leadership Cobb in 2027, reflecting the trust and respect he has earned across professional and community circles. Graham declined participation in Leadership Cobb due to the significant time commitment required while running for office during tax season, prioritizing responsibility and follow‑through. Prior to moving to Marietta last year, Graham was highly engaged in local politics and civic life in Sandy Springs. He currently serves on the advisory board of Golf For The Kids, a nonprofit organization that donates its proceeds to Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta (CHOA), supporting critical care and services for children and families across Georgia. Known for his optimism, accessibility, and genuine desire to connect, Graham is committed to meeting people one‑on‑one—listening carefully, understanding their concerns, and building trust through personal engagement. He brings a data‑driven mindset, real‑world leadership experience, and a deep belief that effective government depends on transparency, approachability, and leaders who are willing to show up, listen, and serve. MFW: I am a social worker (M.S.W.) My career has been spent working for nonprofits, and for 30 years prior to running for office in 2018, I was a lobbyist for nonprofits at the Georgia state capitol. My primary focus was on women, children and families, working on education, childcare, access to healthcare for women, children and low income families, nutrition, mental health services and school nutrition. I had to end my work as a lobbyist to run for office in 2018. I flipped House District 37, defeating a four term Republican incumbent who held a majority leadership position. My committee assignments as a first term legislator were Governmental Affairs, Natural Resources & Environment and State Properties. I have since been added to the Retirement and Energy, Utilities and Telecommunications Committees (and removed from State Properties). I have worked hard on environmental issues including removal and safer storage of coal ash from open pits, including those at Georgia Power’s Plant McDonough in Cobb County and on saving the Okefenokee Swamp from mining. In Governmental Affairs we have dealt with elections and fought hard against the many challenges to fair and safe access to voting for all Georgians. That fight continues today with legislation that would disrupt midterm elections throughout Georgia if passed. I have also fought successfully for increased and/or restored state funding for childcare subsidies for working families, domestic violence and sexual assault programs, and have been a fierce opponent of school vouchers. I am seeking a fifth term to be able to continue this work. Q: What is your current profession? GB: Application Developer, IT Specialist and AI consultant MFW: Retired Q: What college or university did you attend? GB: Stetson Honors College - Biochemistry, Georgia State University - Business Administration, Kennesaw State University - Information Technology focusing on Cybersecurity. I declined to finish my degree at this time due to the extensive experience I have in the field and the issue of AI taking over most aspects of the profession. MFW: Earlham College (Richmond,IN) B.A.Psychology and University of Georgia School of Social Work, Masters degree in Social Work Q: Have you served in the military? If yes, what branch and in what role? GB: no MFW: no
Policy Positions: Healthcare Q: Do you support full Medicaid expansion in Georgia? Why or why not? GB: Yes. I fully support Medicaid expansion in Georgia. Expanding Medicaid is one of the most direct ways we can support working families, especially low-income residents and children, by increasing access to affordable, life-saving healthcare. No one should have to choose between getting care and paying their bills. As we expand coverage, we also need to ensure it is comprehensive and inclusive. That means protecting access to reproductive healthcare, including abortion care, and ensuring transgender Georgians have access to medically necessary care such as hormone therapy and gender-affirming procedures. Healthcare should be accessible, affordable, and respectful of people’s needs. Medicaid expansion is a critical step toward that goal. MFW: Yes. Medicaid expansion is the most efficient and best answer for providing access to affordable health care for the thousands of uninsured and underinsured Georgians. The federal match makes the Medicaid expansion affordable for the state.
Gun Safety Q: What gun safety legislation would you support or oppose? GB: I support common-sense gun safety measures that focus on responsibility, prevention, and keeping our communities safe. I would support strengthening Child Access Prevention (CAP) laws. Georgia currently has CAP laws, but it only holds parents or guardians accountable after harm has already occurred. We need to go further by requiring firearms to be securely stored and locked, especially in homes where children are present. I also support lowering the threshold for prosecution in cases where a firearm is recklessly left accessible to a child. Preventing access before tragedy happens should be the goal, not just responding after the fact. To make compliance easier, I would support tax credits or incentives to help gun owners purchase safe storage equipment. Responsible gun ownership should be supported and encouraged. School shootings and accidental shootings are preventable, and we must hold reckless gun owners accountable. That is why I support stronger safe storage laws. I also support repealing Georgia’s “Stand Your Ground” law. Our laws should prioritize de-escalation, accountability, and public safety. MFW: All firearms purchases should be registered and the “gun show” loophole should be closed. I opposed open carry and the lack of permit requirement to do so. I do not think guns should be allowed on campuses, childcare facilities, churches, etc. I think safe storage of weapons should be required.
Immigration & State Cooperation with Federal Authorities Q: 1) What actions would you take regarding ICE detention facilities operating in Georgia? 2) Do you support limiting or prohibiting state and local cooperation with ICE? Please explain. 3) What limits, if any, should the State of Georgia place on cooperation between state/local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities? GB: 1) I’m running for this seat because I want to help my local community. When I’m elected, I will remain a constant presence in Marietta with the people who elected me. I won’t be a typical state representative. There’s a kind of political etiquette that says when you’re elected at the state level, you’re not supposed to reach down into local government. I don’t agree with that. I’m running to serve my community, and that means working at every level where decisions are being made. At the local level, I plan to work closely with Cobb County and the City of Marietta to prevent ICE detention facilities from being built in our community. These facilities are approved and contracted locally, and that’s where we have the power to stop them. At the state level, I would support restricting or prohibiting the use of state funds for the construction of ICE detention facilities or for leasing facilities to ICE. I would also support legislation to restrict or prohibit the operation of private, for-profit detention centers in Georgia. 2) I support using every legal mechanism available to limit state and local cooperation with ICE. As Democrats, we need to be clear about who we are fighting for. That means standing up for all people, not just those who can vote in our elections. Our responsibility is to protect our communities, and that includes our immigrant neighbors. Limiting cooperation with ICE is about safety and trust. When people are afraid to interact with local government or law enforcement, it makes our entire community less safe. I will support policies that reduce that fear and ensure that local institutions are serving the people who live here. 3) I would support legislation at the state level to limit, as much as legally possible, the sharing of information between state and local law enforcement and ICE. That includes prohibiting state agencies from sharing personal information that could be used for immigration enforcement. People should feel safe applying for a driver’s license, accessing services, or interacting with government without fear. I also support banning agreements that expand ICE’s authority at the local level, such as programs that deputize local law enforcement as federal immigration agents. Local police should be focused on serving our communities, not acting as an extension of federal immigration enforcement. Beyond legislation, I would use my position to work directly with county and city leaders to ensure these protections are implemented locally. This is an issue where state leadership and local action have to work together. Finally, I would support requirements that federal agents clearly identify themselves and do not conceal their identities, so that residents know who they are interacting with and can protect their rights. MFW: I oppose having ICE detention facilities in Georgia. I think current methods of detention of immigrants is unlawful, unconstitutional and immoral. I do NOT support local cooperation between local and state law enforcement and ICE. When it became known that the City of Marietta (my home district) police department had signed a 287g agreement, three of my fellow Cobb legislators and I met with the Marietta Chief of Police within 24 hours. We opposed the agreement and pushed for minimal cooperation with ICE, and for transparency and open communication as the situation may change. I wish the state would push back on participation with ICE agents and oppose the deployment of ICE agents to our state, but the Republican majority party leaders has taken the opposite position.
Housing & Corporate Ownership Q: Do you support legislation limiting corporate and private equity ownership of single-family housing? If so, what specific policies would you pursue? GB: Yes. This question gets at the demand side of the housing crisis, which we have to address if we want housing to be affordable again. I strongly support limiting the role of large corporate and private equity investors in the single-family housing market. These entities are buying up homes at scale, driving up prices, and turning what should be stable neighborhoods into profit centers. At the state level, I would support legislation like the proposal from Representative Gabriel Sanchez to cap the number of single-family homes that a single investor can own. I would also support higher tax rates on large-scale investors acquiring multiple properties, especially those operating at the scale of owning hundreds or thousands of homes. To protect homebuyers, I would introduce legislation that gives individuals and families a fair shot at purchasing homes by creating an initial window where only owner-occupants can submit offers before investors are allowed to bid. I want to be clear that this is not about small landlords or retirees who own a few properties. This is about large institutional investors who are distorting the market and making it harder for working families to buy a home. At the same time, we have to address the supply side. We need to build more housing and make it easier and less expensive to do so. That means reducing unnecessary barriers to construction, supporting zoning reforms that allow for more housing types, and creating targeted incentives for developers to build high-quality, affordable housing. Solving the housing crisis requires action on both sides. We need to rein in speculative demand while also increasing supply so that housing is treated as a place to live, not just an investment vehicle. MFW: Yes. Solutions to the problem of corporate ownership of residential housing have been debated in one of my committees, Governmental Affairs. Legislation has been proposed and debated. This is a difficult issue to address but we’re working on it.
Reproductive Rights Q: Do you support repeal of Georgia’s six-week abortion ban? What additional policies would you support to protect reproductive rights? GB: Yes. I strongly support repealing Georgia’s six-week abortion ban. Decisions about pregnancy and abortion should be made between a person and their doctor, not politicians. We should not be asking people to justify their circumstances or forcing them to navigate government intrusion into private medical decisions. Beyond repeal, I would support codifying the right to access abortion care in Georgia law so that these protections are clear and durable. I would also support restricting the use of state funds for so-called “crisis pregnancy centers” that mislead and target vulnerable people seeking care. If public funds are used, they should go toward legitimate, evidence-based healthcare. I recognize that Georgia is currently a Republican-controlled state, so we should also pursue incremental protections where possible. That includes expanding the definition of medical necessity to explicitly include mental health, and removing burdensome reporting requirements for rape and incest exceptions that force survivors to engage with law enforcement in order to access care. My goal is to remove barriers, restore trust in our healthcare system, and ensure that everyone in Georgia has access to safe, legal, and compassionate reproductive care. MFW: Yes. Passage of HB 481 was a huge blow and the impact has been as bad or worse than predicted. I want a return to easy and safe access to abortion services during the first two trimesters with access to abortion later in pregnancy as an option as needed to protect the mother’s life or in cases when the parents choose termination due to other medical issues with the fetus. I want medical care for pregnancy to be a private issue for women with no interference from the government.
Voting Rights & Democracy Q: What policies will you support to expand access to voting and protect election integrity in Georgia? GB: Protecting voting rights starts with showing up and doing the job. As a state legislator, I will be present, engaged, and voting every time because every vote matters, especially as we continue to see attacks on voting rights across Georgia. I will support policies that expand access to the ballot, including increasing early voting opportunities, protecting and expanding vote-by-mail access, and ensuring that every community has convenient, well-resourced polling locations so no one has to wait hours to vote. I also support strengthening voter protections by opposing voter roll purges, eliminating unnecessary ID barriers, and ensuring that election administration is fair, transparent, and nonpartisan. Beyond the state level, I will stay deeply engaged in my local community to make sure access is truly equal in practice. In Marietta, there are neighborhoods where residents have to travel significantly farther to reach their assigned polling location. It is not a coincidence that these are often lower-income communities with fewer resources. I will use my position to highlight these disparities and work with local officials to ensure polling locations are equitably distributed so that every voter, regardless of income or neighborhood, has a fair and accessible path to the ballot. At the same time, I strongly oppose efforts to undermine local democracy, including attempts to make Cobb County elections nonpartisan. These efforts are not neutral. They disproportionately impact diverse, majority-Black and brown communities like ours and risk diluting representation and accountability. Election integrity means making sure every eligible voter can cast a ballot and have it counted. I will stand with my community to protect that right and push back against any effort to take it away. MFW: I fought against many of the changes to Georgia election law and hope for them to be overturned in the future. No restrictions on absentee voting, ballot drop boxes accessible 24/7 (not locked behind doors & accessible only during business hours), protection and expansion of early voting, no automatic purging of voter rolls after inactivity, ending unlimited voter roll challenges to election boards. There have been so many big and small attacks on making voting easy and accessible for all citizens. I want all these changes and restrictions reversed.
Campaign Priorities Q: Please list the three (3) key issues of your campaign in order of urgency. GB: (1) Lower the cost of living, (2) Protect fundamental rights and freedoms, (3) Prepare Georgia for the future economy MFW: Protection of women’s reproductive rights. Protection of voting rights. Gun safety. Q: Why is your top priority the most urgent issue for your constituents? GB: The most urgent challenge facing residents in my district is the rising cost of living, especially housing, combined with wages that are not keeping pace. Too many people are being priced out of the communities they grew up in, and that instability affects everything from family life to long-term economic security. This issue hits marginalized communities, including LGBTQ Georgians, even harder due to ongoing discrimination in housing and employment. Many LGBTQ residents, especially young people, face housing insecurity at higher rates. Without the ability to rely on family support, many are forced to live independently at a much earlier age, making access to safe, stable, and affordable housing even more critical. I will fight to lower housing costs and expand access to affordable options so that people can stay in their communities and build stable lives. If we don’t address the cost of living, especially housing, everything else becomes harder. That’s why it is my top priority. MFW: Women are dying while trying to access pregnancy-related health care. We’ve had a least two deaths since HB 481 went into effect.
Community Engagement & Accountability Q: How will you remain accessible and accountable to constituents if elected? GB: I will remain accessible by being consistently present and creating multiple ways for constituents to engage with me. I plan to hold monthly town halls during the legislative session and quarterly town halls during the off-season. These won’t be one-size-fits-all meetings. I will host them at different times and in different parts of the district to ensure they are accessible to people with 9 to 5 schedules as well as shift workers. Beyond that, accountability means listening to everyone, not just supporters. It’s easy to hear from people who already agree with you. I am committed to listening to those who are critical, who think I can do better, and who expect more from their representative. I will meet people where they are, both geographically and politically, and make sure their concerns are heard and reflected in my work. My goal is to be a representative who shows up, listens, and responds. MFW: I have always tried to be accessible and accountable to constituents. I work to respond to emails and phone messages and am proud of the constituent services I have been able to provide. I do not do so well with social media but am working on improving my outreach and communication with constituents. Q: How do you plan to work with grassroots and community organizations? GB: Today In office, I plan to engage with grassroots and community organizations as much as possible to understand what different communities actually need. It’s important to me that I meet people where they are, both politically and physically. That means building relationships year-round, not just during election season. Even during the legislative session, I will stay connected to community groups so their voices are reflected in the decisions being made at the Capitol. I will regularly attend community meetings, partner with local organizations, and create open lines of communication so grassroots leaders can share concerns directly with my office. These organizations are often closest to the issues and have the best understanding of what solutions will actually work. For example, I will work closely with groups like A Better Cobb on transit and housing, where they bring real expertise and community insight, and Cobb Indivisible on voting rights, where they are deeply engaged in protecting access to the ballot. I have also gotten close with Bella Moss and My goal is to make sure policy is not created in a vacuum, but informed by the people most impacted by it. Please rewrite this and include helping out with the 3/28 marietta square no kings protest, that I'm very close with Bella Moss with Youth Against Abuse, I've already met with Marietta Blue Ladies and Cobb Dems, Here’s a polished, cohesive rewrite that weaves in everything you asked for while keeping the tone grounded, community‑focused, and forward‑looking: In office, I plan to stay deeply connected to grassroots and community organizations so I can understand what people across our district truly need. Meeting people where they are—both politically and physically—is essential to me.That means building relationships year‑round, not just during election season, and staying engaged even during the legislative session so community voices are reflected in the decisions being made at the Capitol. I will regularly attend community meetings, partner with local organizations, and keep open lines of communication so grassroots leaders can share concerns directly with my office. These groups are often closest to the issues and have the clearest sense of what solutions will actually work. I’ve already begun that work. I’ve met with the Marietta Blue Ladies and Cobb Dems, and I’ve built strong relationships with organizers who are doing the hard work every day. I’m very close with Bella Moss of Youth Against Abuse, whose leadership and advocacy for young people continue to shape my understanding of what our community needs. I also plan to support and show up for community‑led actions, including helping with the 3/28 Marietta Square “No Kings” protest, because standing with people in moments of urgency matters. I will continue working closely with groups like A Better Cobb on transit and housing, where they bring real expertise and community insight, and with Cobb Indivisible on voting rights, where they are deeply engaged in protecting access to the ballot. My goal is simple: policy should never be created in a vacuum. It should be informed by the people most impacted by it, shaped through collaboration, and grounded in the lived experiences of our community. If you want, I can also tighten this into a shorter version, turn it into a stump speech paragraph, or adjust the tone to be more formal or more conversational. I recently already helped with No kings protest it already happened. Absolutely — here’s a clean, polished rewrite that reflects that the protest already happened and incorporates all the relationships and community work you mentioned: In office, I plan to stay deeply connected to grassroots and community organizations so I can understand what people across our district truly need. Meeting people where they are—both politically and physically—is essential to me. That means building relationships year‑round, not just during election season, and staying engaged even during the legislative session so community voices are reflected in the decisions being made at the Capitol. I will regularly attend community meetings, partner with local organizations, and keep open lines of communication so grassroots leaders can share concerns directly with my office. These groups are often closest to the issues and have the clearest sense of what solutions will actually work. I’ve already begun that work. I’ve met with the Marietta Blue Ladies and Cobb Dems, and I’ve built strong relationships with organizers who are doing the hard work every day. I’m very close with Bella Moss of Youth Against Abuse, whose leadership and advocacy for young people continue to shape my understanding of what our community needs. I also recently helped with the “No Kings” protest on 3/28 in Marietta Square, standing alongside community members who are committed to protecting democratic values and resisting authoritarianism. I will continue working closely with groups like A Better Cobb on transit and housing, where they bring real expertise and community insight, and with Cobb Indivisible on voting rights, where they are deeply engaged in protecting access to the ballot. My goal is simple: policy should never be created in a vacuum. It should be informed by the people most impacted by it, shaped through collaboration, and grounded in the lived experiences of our community. MFW: I have always worked with grassroots and community organizations - it was a big part of my work as a nonprofit lobbyist. I am proud to say I have connections with a wide range of advocacy and grassroots organizations that focus on issues such as access to health care, reproductive rights, public education, childcare and the environment. These connections have provided me with a wealth of well researched policy information.
Endorsements & Transparency Q: What organizations or individuals have endorsed your campaign? GB: None yet MFW: Georgia WINlist, Georgia Conservation Voters, (Endorsements from previous years that I’m applying for include labor unions, GAE, many others). Q: Please provide links to any published endorsements (if available). GB: n/a MFW: Not available yet Q: Do you accept campaign contributions from corporate PACs, Big Tech, cryptocurrency interests, or major political advocacy organizations such as AIPAC? Why or why not? GB: No. I do not accept contributions from corporate PACs, special interests, or major political advocacy organizations. I’m running to represent working families, not corporations. I would rather knock on more doors and talk to more people than build a campaign funded by interests that could call my integrity into question. The people I represent live in House District 37. They are not Big Tech, pharmaceutical companies, cryptocurrency interests, or lobbying organizations. My responsibility is to them, and I want my votes to reflect that clearly and without doubt. I’ve also signed the Move to Amend pledge to further demonstrate my commitment to getting money out of politics. I know what it feels like as a voter to wonder why your representative voted a certain way when it didn’t match what they promised during election season. Then you look at their donor list, and suddenly it makes sense. I’ve seen decisions that appear to be influenced by donations as small as a few hundred dollars. I will never sell out my constituents for any amount of money. At a time when Republicans are attacking voting rights and the integrity of our elections in Georgia, we should be raising the standard for trust in government. That includes making sure elected officials are accountable to their constituents, not to moneyed interests. Refusing these contributions is how I will maintain that trust and vote freely for my district, all Georgians, and working families. If corporate PACs and special interests are upset with me, that means I’m doing my job. MFW: I do not believe I have received any contribution s from corporate PACS or Big Tech. Certainly not from cryptocurrency interests. Major political advocacy organizations is a pretty broad term- I’ve received support from the Georgia Trial Lawyers, Emily’s List. Q: How much cash-on-hand does your campaign currently have? GB: n/a MFW: approximately $11,000 Q: Please list your five largest contributors. GB: n/a MFW: Roy Barnes, Georgia Trial Lawyers, labor unions. Q: Provide links to any pledges you have signed at the request of other organizations. GB: https://www.movetoamend.org/pledge2025#stateAnchor_Georgia MFW: n/a
US Congressional District 11


Background and Experience: Q: Briefly introduce yourself. (Key background and relevant experience - not a full biography.) CH: I grew up in a trailer here in north Georgia. I’m now an attorney who defends parents in DFCS cases in juvenile court. My wife is an attorney as well and we own an estate planning and probate firm in Woodstock. We are raising 5 year old triplets. BW: I am a 35+ year resident of Atlanta (Marietta, specifically). I moved here after college and raised my family and started my business here. As a self employed business owner, I fully understand the impact of healthcare and prescription costs doubling and tripling. As a real estate agent, I know first hand the impact of housing affordability and the role tarrifs and immigration policies have had on supply. As a father, I understand the impact of student and medical debt on people just starting their careers. And, as a father of a daughter, I am very concerned about the government's overreach on a woman's right to control her own body and encroachment on reproductive rights. As a human being, I am concerned about an overzealous immigration policy that doesn't discriminate between criminals and people seeing a better life or asylum from persecution. For over 35 years, I’ve built a career on delivering outcomes, not promises. I’ve worked with homeowners and business owners, bringing people together to solve real problems. This job requires more than just passion and a desire to fix things. It requires earned judgment, tested leadership, and delivering real-world results. Some people are running on ideas. I’m running on experience and execution. I know how to listen. I know how to lead. And I have a proven track record of getting things done. Q: What is your current profession? CH: Attorney BW: Real Estate Q: What college or university did you attend? CH: Georgia State University and Atlanta’s John Marshall Law School BW: Cornell University Q: Have you served in the military? If yes, what branch and in what role? CH: no BW: no
Policy Positions: Healthcare Q: Do you support full Medicaid expansion in Georgia? Why or why not? CH: Yes, it is a public safety net. It is there to help provide insurance to those that cannot afford private insurance. But it is also a market factor that helps lower premiums by providing competition to private insurance providers. BW: Why
Gun Safety Q: What gun safety legislation would you support or oppose? CH: I would support background checks, gun safety training, and any legislation geared at responsible gun ownership BW: Support: Background checks; red flag laws; registration requirements; restrictions on some ownership
Immigration & State Cooperation with Federal Authorities Q: 1) What actions would you take regarding ICE detention facilities operating in Georgia? 2) Do you support limiting or prohibiting state and local cooperation with ICE? Please explain. 3) What limits, if any, should the State of Georgia place on cooperation between state/local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities? CH: I want to take ICE back to pre-Trump levels, policies, and procedures. If after that detention center are necessary then they should be state/government run not by corporations trying to make a profit. BW: At the Federal level, I support limiting funding of detention facilities to only those based on actual need; I think the state should cooperate with the federal authorities and the states should have the final word.
Housing & Corporate Ownership Q: Do you support legislation limiting corporate and private equity ownership of single-family housing? If so, what specific policies would you pursue? CH: Yes, I would like to de-incentivize corporations from looking at the housing market and investments. I think a period of right of first refusal to allow locals, first time buyers, and veterans first dibs over new housing in the market would help. I would support the current 21st century ROAD to Housing Act just passed by the Senate as well. It looks to increase the supply side of the market; which should help lower pricing. It also would require corporations to sell any property within 8 years. BW: Yes. I support limiting the number of houses a single entity may own in a given geographic area. I would also support creating incentives for the houses to be sold in a certain period so that private individuals can have a chance to get ownership.
Reproductive Rights Q: Do you support repeal of Georgia’s six-week abortion ban? What additional policies would you support to protect reproductive rights? CH: Women’s reproductive rights is one of my biggest priorities. It is unacceptable that we have women dying in parking lots of hospitals because doctors fear losing their licenses or going to jail. I want to repeal all abortions bans and codify Roe. BW: Yes, I support the repeal. I would like to see an individual's right to healthcare be protected from any state or federal intervention.
Voting Rights & Democracy Q: What policies will you support to expand access to voting and protect election integrity in Georgia? CH: As a federal candidate, I want to make voting easier not harder, I want to protect everyone’s right to vote, and I want to give states tools to improve equipment, cybersecurity, and training. BW: Voting should be accessible by mail and in person as well as thru early voting dates. Any attempt to change this should be a federal crime. Voting registration should also be allowed when someone gets or renews a driver's license or passport.
Campaign Priorities Q: Please list the three (3) key issues of your campaign in order of urgency. CH: Stopping the Constitutional crisis, lowering the cost of living, and Women’s reproductive rights. BW: Healthcare access and affordability; lowering the cost of prescriptions and groceries; saving social security from insolvency Q: Why is your top priority the most urgent issue for your constituents? CH: While America is built for stress test, we find ourselves at a breaking point. This November election is critical to our democracy. We have to get our government back to 3 EQUAL branches of government. BW: Affordable, accessible and quality healthcare and insurance
Community Engagement & Accountability Q: How will you remain accessible and accountable to constituents if elected? CH: That is my intention. The number 1 complaint about Loudermilk is that he never response or listens to the people. I want to do better than that. I would consider holding town halls as well. BW: I will host district townhalls in person or online; I will maintain a local office in the district for constituents to visit; I will make sure all inbound communication is responded to in a timely manner. Q: How do you plan to work with grassroots and community organizations? CH: I am building a grassroots movement now. I have been meeting with leaders in many areas to see how I can help; unions, teachers, department of elections, Rabbi, and local groups and clubs. It how I learn the needs of the CD11. BW: I will be elected from the grassroots and will maintain contact with them. I will make sure my office is aware of local issues and concerns and that we have a beneficial two way dialogue.
Endorsements & Transparency Q: What organizations or individuals have endorsed your campaign? CH: Candidates for common good is the only one so far. I am in a primary so many have not been able to come out and fully endorse me just yet. BW: None Q: Please provide links to any published endorsements (if available). CH: Chrishardenforcongress.com BW: n/a Q: Do you accept campaign contributions from corporate PACs, Big Tech, cryptocurrency interests, or major political advocacy organizations such as AIPAC? Why or why not? CH: No, because they tend to have a specific agenda and that is normally to improve their bottom line. However there are PACs out there that support general ideas whose platforms are similar to mine that want to improve their bottom line general welfare or everyone, not just improving their profits. BW: To date, I have not received any donations from any source other than individuals. I will not accept money from any person or organization that requires a quid pro quo of support or expects carte blanche support as a condition of their donation. Q: How much cash-on-hand does your campaign currently have? CH: About $5k BW: 10,000 Q: Please list your five largest contributors. CH: Everyone is an individual. My father in law, his business partner, my director of policy, my campaign manager, and the rest of my core team. (Who are all volunteers) BW: They are all individual supporters. Q: Provide links to any pledges you have signed at the request of other organizations. CH: None so far. BW: n/a
Georgia Senate District 37


Background and Experience: Q: Briefly introduce yourself. (Key background and relevant experience - not a full biography.) DC: I am Air Force wife and mother of four who has raised kids in Cobb public schools, with one at KSU and one about to enter the US Navy. I have lived all over the country but have proudly called Georgia and SD37 my forever home for almost 6 years. While raising a family, I have found meaningful ways to deeply connect with my communities through service and leadership, while also working as a communications consultant primarily focusing on non-profits. I am also an Elder at Kirkwood Presbyterian Church where I lead the Sustainability Committee. ZN: My family moved to Georgia when I was in 6th grade as a result of the great financial crisis and deteriorating economic opportunity of Detroit. I grew up watching my parents struggle to make ends meet and have worked since I was 15 years old. I put myself through college, where I studied accounting & finance to avoid experiencing what my parents went through. As I studied accounting and earned my CPA, I began to understand how favorable our tax code was to corporations rather than individuals. I started my career as an auditor, working on audits of Fortune 100 companies, then later became a finance manager where I manage large corporate budgets. In early 2024, I realized that all my productive energy was going towards making someone else rich and all my political energy was focused on staying informed, rather than doing something about it. It was as if a switch flipped. Knowing what a 2nd Trump presidency would mean, I threw myself into community organizing to do everything I could to prevent it. I re-chartered the Cobb Young Democrats, became a DPG State Committee Member in Cobb County, and then went on to become VP of Membership at the Young Democrats of Georgia. It has become my mission to reshape the Democratic party into a reflection of the community, not special interests. Through my years organizing in Cobb, I have found a passion in community organizing and fighting for what I know is right. I got off the sidelines years ago because I know what is at stake. History is being written and the choices we collectively make over the next year will determine what path we go down for decades. Q: What is your current profession? DC: Communications consultant ZN: Finance Manager / CPA Q: What college or university did you attend? DC: Portland State University ZN: Kennesaw State University Q: Have you served in the military? If yes, what branch and in what role? DC: no ZN: no
Policy Positions: Healthcare Q: Do you support full Medicaid expansion in Georgia? Why or why not? DC: Georgia absolutely needs to expand Medicaid to get more families insured, increase health outcomes, keep rural hospitals open and prevent medical bankruptcy. Growing up, I dealt with both parents facing cancer. I helped my dad get Medicaid when he became disabled from a brain tumor. I helped my mom get coverage under the ACA after years of being uninsurable due to a previous cancer diagnosis. The stress of inadequate insurance and healthcare access on vulnerable families is real. We must put politics aside in order to ensure the health and safety of the families we represent. ZN: Yes, I support Medicaid expansion in Georgia. I believe that every Georgian deserves, at the minimum, access to affordable, quality healthcare. We have the opportunity to receive federal dollars to help so many of our neighbors, all we have to do is accept it. Georgia is one of 10 states that has not adopted Medicaid expansion. At the same time, Georgia has seen an increasing number of rural hospitals close, which has left many Georgians without access to medical care. Expanding Medicaid would ensure that over half a million Georgians would have some form of coverage and allow for rural hospitals to recover some of the cost of providing care to those without insurance. Expanding Medicaid would also bring billions of federal dollars into the state. That is real money that would be paid to workers, nurses, admin, and many others. Georgia would be on the hook for 10% of the cost. Spending one dollar to receive nine, along with countless jobs and expanded healthcare access, is a great investment no matter what angle you take.
Gun Safety Q: What gun safety legislation would you support or oppose? DC: We need common-sense gun laws based on real data. We can start with background checks on all gun sales, require safe storage, institute “red flag” laws, and keep firearms out of the hands of convicted domestic abusers. We must change the culture of discussions about the 2nd Amendment. We can have both responsible gun ownership and legislation that protects Georgians from gun violence. However, enacting preemptive laws has been harmful, putting Georgia as one of the weakest states on gun safety legislation. ZN: I support many common sense gun safety laws. While I understand and support the second amendment, I know that we can do better to protect our communities and our children. I will support red flag laws, universal background checks, closing gun show loopholes, banning switches, increased access to firearm safety courses, increased penalties for "straw" purchases, and safe storage requirements & tax credits. Additionally, I will be a strong advocate for increased mental health funding. This is critical in preventing or catching issues before the community is impacted.
Immigration & State Cooperation with Federal Authorities Q: 1) What actions would you take regarding ICE detention facilities operating in Georgia? 2) Do you support limiting or prohibiting state and local cooperation with ICE? Please explain. 3) What limits, if any, should the State of Georgia place on cooperation between state/local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities? DC: As a mother of Hispanic, mixed-race children, I am appalled that we live in a world where my dark-skinned, dark-haired daughter needs to carry her passport on her for fear of getting picked up by ICE. I believe there is no place for large-scale ICE detention camps in Georgia. Like we are trying to “press pause” on data centers, we need to stop ICE expansion into our state. Local municipalities need to be empowered to reject these camps coming into their communities. At the very least, the state should not be funding any detention centers. I would stand beside my fellow Senators in advancing legislation like SB 549. We need to stop our state lawmakers from doing the bidding of the president’s administration. Laws like HB 1105 that encourage cooperation should be reexamined in the current era of ICE surges. ZN: I would ensure that these facilities are held to providing livable standards. I would support filing lawsuits against ICE in instances where their facilities are found to be inhumane. I will also advocate for Georgia to establish a oversight body where abuses can be documented and reported. I support prohibiting cooperation with ICE. When state and local enforcement cooperates with ICE, it erodes community trust. Undocumented immigrants are less likely to cooperate with or rely on law enforcement when they believe that it can put them at risk. This will lead to crimes going unreported, greater tensions during traffic stops, and making our community less safe. I believe that we should limit as much activity as possible, but especially in sensitive locations such as schools, churches, courthouses, and community zones. Additionally, ICE should be restricted from operating around voting locations. Even though there has been no evidence of undocumented immigrants voting in elections, I'm extremely concerned about ICE being deployed to polling locations to intimidate voters and subvert the 2026 elections.
Housing & Corporate Ownership Q: Do you support legislation limiting corporate and private equity ownership of single-family housing? If so, what specific policies would you pursue? DC: I am very concerned about the pressure private equity has put on the housing marketing. Real estate ownership has been a vehicle for helping families build stability, but since private equity started buying up foreclosures in the ’08 crisis, less and less affordable starter single-family homes are available to young adults and new families. I am concerned that my young adults will face greater challenges in establishing themselves independently because of the lack of affordable housing and skyrocketing rents, property values and property taxes. As this is somewhat of a bipartisan issue, there is hope that legislation can be adopted to address this growing concern. I would stand with lawmakers of both parties to curb the amount of single-family properties a corporation can own and call for lawmakers to reject campaign funding from lobbyists associated with private equity. ZN: Yes, I absolutely support limiting corporate and private equity ownership of single family housing. I support placing a cap, or mathematical cap, on the number of SFH that can be owned by private entities. The problem that legislation has struggled to address is "beneficial ownership" of real estate investment firms comprised of various LLC's. Companies have avenues to work around the cap by spreading out ownership of each SFH across various legal entities and obscuring ownership. Another potential problem, is firms spreading out equity amongst various subsidiaries to subvert reporting requirements. As an attempt to close these loopholes, I support requiring parent companies to report the number of SFH across all of their subsidiaries, regardless of ownership percentage. Once the true number of SFH owned is available, we could institute a progressive taxation policy where the more SFH a company owns, the higher their tax burden. This would mathematically cap the number of SFH a company would be willing to hold.
Reproductive Rights Q: Do you support repeal of Georgia’s six-week abortion ban? What additional policies would you support to protect reproductive rights? DC: I will absolutely support all efforts to ensure the reproductive freedoms rights for women. I staunchly oppose Georgia's heartbeat bill, I am in favor of the recent efforts to expand easy access to contraception, will continue to lobby current seat holders for Medicaid expansion and support for rural healthcare, and I am glad to see that there continues to be pushback on bills that try to sneak in anti-trans amendments. I will ally myself with Reproductive Freedom for All and Amplify Georgia. I am in full support of all efforts to repeal HB 481. ZN: Yes. I do not support our government being involved in healthcare decisions. We cannot claim to be a country or state that values freedom, when half of our population isn't free to make decisions about their own bodies. Additionally, I support additional protections for access to contraception, FDA approved abortion medications, protecting healthcare providers from prosecution, and protecting interstate travel for reproductive care.
Voting Rights & Democracy Q: What policies will you support to expand access to voting and protect election integrity in Georgia? DC: Personally, I think it is shameful that our state has put forth laws that suppress voters and serve to weaken the democratic process. We need to identify and call out voter suppression whenever we see it, even when it is convoluted, as in SB 573 and now the usurped HB 369. We must staunchly protect early voting, maintain easy access to absentee ballots and preserve our current system of electronic voting. I will work to advance SB 536, the Henry McNeal Turner Voting Rights Act, in the next legislative session. ZN: The right to vote is one of our most sacred rights. I believe that every citizen should have as few barriers as possible in order to exercise their right. I support automatic voter registration, same-day voter registration, longer early voting periods, expanding the number of polling locations, and independent redistricting commissions. As a priority, I will support increased state funding for expanding the number of polling locations and staffing. Limiting the number of polling locations is a common tactic used to suppress votes through inconvenience. Many counties struggle to come up with funding for polling locations, poll workers, and election equipment.
Campaign Priorities Q: Please list the three (3) key issues of your campaign in order of urgency. DC: Affordability, voting rights, healthcare (including reproductive freedom) ZN: Affordability, Healthcare & Reproductive Rights, Voting Rights Q: Why is your top priority the most urgent issue for your constituents? DC: Affordability ZN: We are living through one of the most extreme cost of living crises in recent memory. While wages have stayed flat for decades, inflation has run rampant. Georgians are getting priced out of homes, starting a family is being delayed due to costs, and many people are one layoff away from a unrecoverable financial tailspin. These impacts are felt across generations. Many parents are seeing their adult children forced to return home just so they can afford to live. They're seeing their kids unable to build a solid foundation in their early career, even if they're lucky enough to find a decent job. Young parents are facing a choice: work so you can afford childcare or live one layoff away from a crisis. Long-time homeowners, who are often on a limited budget, are receiving increased property tax bills year after year. This is a unsustainable situation. Our country and state are at its best when everyone has the opportunity and ability to succeed. I will work relentlessly to limit corporate ownership of homes, ensure we have a state tax code that works for everyone, and make living more affordable.
Community Engagement & Accountability Q: How will you remain accessible and accountable to constituents if elected? DC: One of the reasons I decided to run is because our current Senator is neither accessible or transparent. As a leader for my district, I will create robust external communications (newsletter, social media, press releases), be present in the community at events, hold town hall meetings and return constituent calls and emails. I will embrace and honor my role as public servant. I will actively listen to the needs and struggles of those living in my district, and be a resource to help my constituents. Above all, I will lead with my core values of integrity, kindness and respect. ZN: I have been organizing long before I considered running for office and through that journey, I have built many relationships with local organizations. Should I have the privilege of being elected, I would continue to expand these partnerships and dedicate myself to being accessible to the community. I strongly believe that the best legislators are those who continue to show up and ensure they stay grounded in community relationships. One thing that I think our current elected officials could improve on is being proactive with communicating legislative issues back to community organizations. If elected, I would make this a priority. Q: How do you plan to work with grassroots and community organizations? DC: These groups are the backbone of democracy and I am proud to support groups such as Indivisible Cobb, The Cobb Progressives and A Better Cobb. As a legislator, I will continue to collaborate with local groups, listen and learn from their members and find ways to work together to advance our common goals. ZN: My campaign is based on grassroots organizations. I plan to work with community organizations on the campaign trail and under the gold dome. I believe our democracy works best when candidates rely on people power rather than focusing entirely on fundraising. When a candidate gets elected by building a movement, they are beholden to the movement rather than donors with access to wealth. I will host & attend town-halls, forums, or any event where the community has a chance to give feedback and express concerns. It is more important than ever to build a vast network of local organizations committed to electing representatives, not politicians.
Endorsements & Transparency Q: What organizations or individuals have endorsed your campaign? DC: Georgia WIN Lisa, Representative Lisa Campbell, The Cobb Progressives ZN: UFCW 1996, Davante Jennings (President of Young Democrats of Georgia) and IBEW 613 & Young Democrats of Georgia are pending finalization Q: Please provide links to any published endorsements (if available). DC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dxwzxY0NmFY ZN: n/a Q: Do you accept campaign contributions from corporate PACs, Big Tech, cryptocurrency interests, or major political advocacy organizations such as AIPAC? Why or why not? DC: I have singed the Pledge to Amend and will not accept any campaign contributions that do not align with my values. ZN: No. I have not and will not. I believe that money in politics is one of the primary issues preventing us from solving a whole host of issues. It is impossible for the average person to match or even attempt to compete with PAC dollars. Citizens United completely upended the incentive structure of organizing and listening to constituents. I do no believe that simply having access to wealth should increase the weight of someones voice. When PAC's and other monied interests are able vastly outspend citizens they are empowered to use that as leverage to write & amend legislation in their favor. Recently, we have seen this in Georgia with data center expansion. Data center lobbyists were able to secure a sales tax exemption and kill bills that would protect ratepayers from increased energy costs. Q: How much cash-on-hand does your campaign currently have? DC: $12000 ZN: $8500 Q: Please list your five largest contributors. DC: Darcy Castro, Beverly Wynne, Stephanie Light, Lisa Campbell, Kevin Redmond ZN: UFCW, Carrie Stavas, Tim Neville, Morgan Hague, Hong Feng Jin Q: Provide links to any pledges you have signed at the request of other organizations. DC: https://www.movetoamend.org/pledge2025 ZN: n/a
Georgia Supreme Court

Professional Background Q: Briefly describe your legal background and judicial experience (if applicable). JJ: I have spent the last 25 years as an attorney, and then as a state senator, fighting for everyday Georgians. Q: How many years have you practiced law? JJ: 25 Q: Please describe your areas of legal expertise. JJ: Complex civil cases representing individuals versus corporate interests. Q: Have you previously served as a judge? If so, on which court(s)? JJ: no Q: What college, graduate school, and law school did you attend? JJ: I benefited from the support that Georgia offers determined students, going to Georgia Southern University on the encouragement of my public school teachers and a HOPE scholarship, and then working my way through law school at the University of Georgia, where I graduated at the top of my class.
Judicial Philosophy Q: How would you describe your judicial philosophy? JJ: In terms of my judicial philosophy, I believe that we have relied on the federal courts for too long to decide cases concerning people’s rights that could be decided at the state level. Q: What principles guide your interpretation of the Georgia Constitution? JJ: While the Judicial Canons prevent me from taking a position on any matter that might come before Court, I believe that the Georgia State Constitution can be interpreted more expansively than the federal constitution in a lot of areas. That automatically means giving more rights to the citizens of Georgia. Q: How do you balance respect for precedent (stare decisis) with the need to correct past errors? JJ: To me, the state constitution is organic and should always speak to the current people’s will and understanding, and need not depend solely on 250-year-old intentions of Framers who did not believe that women, people of color, and the poor were even worthy of mention. Precedent is important because it helps to ensure stability and ensure that like cases are treated the same way. However, while precedent is important, it is not absolute. The Georgia Supreme Court is the final authority on Georgia law and can overrule its own precedent, and should do so if the prior opinion is wrong or society has evolved. Q: What role should the Georgia Supreme Court play in safeguarding constitutional rights? JJ: The Georgia Supreme Court is the last line of defense for protecting our constitutional rights and freedoms. That’s why it is so important to elect justices who are committed to serving the people and upholding these rights.
Ethics, Independence & Integrity Q: How do you ensure impartiality in cases involving politically sensitive issues? JJ: Impartiality is the cornerstone of judicial service. In cases involving politically sensitive issues, judges must remain guided by the constitution and the rule of law, not by powerful interests. Each case must be approached with an open mind, carefully evaluating the facts and arguments presented by all parties, and applying the law consistently and transparently. This is crucial to preserving public confidence in the Court's independence and fairness. Q: How should judges manage potential conflicts of interest? JJ: Judges have a duty to avoid both actual conflicts of interest and the appearance of impropriety. When a potential conflict arises, the appropriate course is prompt disclosure. Transparency and accountability are essential to maintaining trust in the judicial system. Q: What steps would you take to maintain public confidence in the independence of the judiciary? JJ: I think that the judiciary first needs to earn the people’s trust and confidence. And then it can maintain that trust and confidence by always being transparent, by enforcing a higher ethical bar on its members to ensure fairness in decision-making, and by always centering the people and justice in all decision-making. As a Justice, I hope to maintain that trust by continuing to center everyday Georgians from every community as I consider cases before the court. And I know that I can do that because that is what I have done as a lawyer: representing regular people dealing with some of the most difficult situations of their lives. I have dedicated my professional life to fighting to right the wrongs that have been done to those who are considered the “least of these,” and I will continue to do that as a Justice on the Supreme Court.
Access to Justice Q: What barriers to justice exist in Georgia’s legal system? JJ: I think one of the biggest barriers to justice (that this campaign seeks to remedy) is the fact that there are individuals on the bench that have been chosen because they espouse a certain ideology that protects the powerful – not the people who the court is supposed to serve. If you start behind from the outset, there isn’t much of a chance of getting justice. Full access means being able to rely on the judicial system to consider a case without fear or favor. That is not where we are. But it is certainly where we can be. Q: How can the Supreme Court improve access to the courts for low-income or marginalized communities? JJ: In my opinion, there is an absolute imperative that the state judiciary improve access to the courts and legal representation for marginalized or low-income communities. The Georgia Constitution includes the “right to courts” in our state constitutional Bill of Rights in recognition of the fact that the right to meaningful access and adequate representation is a fundamental right for all Georgians – and a right that should be protected by the courts. Q: What is your view on court transparency and public access to judicial proceedings? JJ: I believe that the Georgia Supreme Court, the Georgia Constitution, and the laws of this state belong to all Georgians. The fact that I am running is evidence of my commitment to transparency and meaningfully engaging Georgians in the work of the court. I’m running for this seat because all Georgians deserve to have a choice in those decisions, but for too long the court has been dominated by insiders hand-picked by the political elite and politically powerfully to issue opinions that reflect (and support) a specific ideological position. That’s why I am running a serious campaign for this seat to truly earn the vote of every Georgian and to finally give voters a choice.
Temperament & Collegiality Q: How do you approach disagreement with fellow justices? JJ: Disagreement is a natural and healthy part of an appellate court. My goal is always to reach the right legal answer. That means engaging seriously with my colleagues’ views, even if we ultimately disagree. Q: What qualities do you believe are most important for serving effectively on a high court? JJ: Approaching each case with respect, careful listening, and a focus on the law and the record are the most important qualities for serving effectively on the high court.
Campaign Transparency Q: What organizations or individuals have endorsed your campaign? JJ: Public – EMILYs List, Asian American Advocacy Fund, Fair Fight Action Not yet public – SEIU, Georgia Equality Q: Please provide links to any published endorsements (if available). JJ: AAAF: https://asianamericanadvocacyfund.org/endorsement-archive/jenjordan; EMILYs List: https://emilyslist.org/state-and-local-candidates/; Fair Fight Action: https://www.instagram.com/fairfightaction/p/DWj81nYCZJp/ Q: Do you accept campaign contributions from corporate PACs, Big Tech, cryptocurrency interests, or major political advocacy organizations such as AIPAC? Why or why not? JJ: No. I am building a campaign that is supported by individuals who care about our democracy and that the constitutional rights of our citizens are protected. Q: How much cash-on-hand does your campaign currently have? JJ: $250,000 Q: Please list your five largest contributors. JJ: My five largest contributors are all individuals who share my campaign’s values and want to see real change in this state. Q: Have you signed any pledges at the request of outside organizations? If so, please provide links. JJ: No. Georgia’s Judicial Canons prevent me from taking a position on any matter that might come before Court.
Georgia State House District 42


Background and Experience: Q: Briefly introduce yourself. (Key background and relevant experience - not a full biography.) GS: I was raised in Cobb County by an immigrant family who taught me to fight for myself and for my community. It’s our responsibility to look out for each other. I believe in what we can accomplish together, and I am honored to serve our community as your Representative in House District 42. As the first Democratic Socialist member elected to the Georgia General Assembly, I see it as an honor to take the fight for working families in my district to the state capitol every single day. Q: What is your current profession? GS: Legislator and Coach Q: What college or university did you attend? GS: Georgia State University Q: Have you served in the military? If yes, what branch and in what role? GS: no
Policy Positions: Healthcare Q: Do you support full Medicaid expansion in Georgia? Why or why not? GS: Yes. I introduced HB 1480, which is a comprehensive bill to implement Medicare for All in Georgia. It includes everything that Medicare already covers, as well as dental, vision, home care, and reproductive rights (which are currently denied under Georgia’s restrictive abortion ban) as well as gender-affirming care. This bill would guarantee health care to all Georgians and be free at the point of service. A board would be established and be charged with finding funding for the program and establishing rules and regulations.
Gun Safety Q: What gun safety legislation would you support or oppose? GS: I co-sponsored HB 2, which provides tax credits for people who buy safe storage for guns. Also, I support banning assault rifles, requiring universal background checks, and red flag laws.
Immigration & State Cooperation with Federal Authorities Q: 1) What actions would you take regarding ICE detention facilities operating in Georgia? 2) Do you support limiting or prohibiting state and local cooperation with ICE? Please explain. 3) What limits, if any, should the State of Georgia place on cooperation between state/local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities? GS: 1. I visited Stewart Detention Center to visit detainees including a constituent who has now since been released. I believe ICE should be abolished and shut down the ice detention centers which are violating human rights 2. I introduced HB 889, which bans the use of masks by ICE agents and requires they publicly identify themselves. I also signed on to HB 470, which bans ICE from schools, hospitals, and places of worship. 3. I signed on to HB 1053, which would repeal Georgia’s outrageous 2024 law (HB 1105) that attempts to force local collaboration with ICE. ICE should be abolished. How they operate sow more fear than instills feelings of safety within members of the community. It is immigrants that make this country worth living in. America is strong because of its diversity not in spite of it.
Housing & Corporate Ownership Q: Do you support legislation limiting corporate and private equity ownership of single-family housing? If so, what specific policies would you pursue? GS: We must repeal the state’s rent control ban, stop major corporations and big landlords from buying up single-family housing just to raise the cost for profit, and invest much more in affordable and public transit-oriented housing. That’s why I introduced House bills 864, 679, and 1188, to stop corporate landlords from buying single-family housing, stop AI from artificially inflating our rents, and ban hidden fees. I also support building on existing legislation (2024 HB 404) to improve the minimum standard of living requirements for housing, including a campaign by advocates to eliminate the ability to require 3x the rent in income to obtain a lease.
Reproductive Rights Q: Do you support repeal of Georgia’s six-week abortion ban? What additional policies would you support to protect reproductive rights? GS: Yes, my Medicare for All bill, HB 1480 has the Reproductive Freedom Act in it.
Voting Rights & Democracy Q: What policies will you support to expand access to voting and protect election integrity in Georgia? GS: For one, I would work to ensure that ICE agents would not be able to exert pressure on vulnerable members of our community by introducing legislation that bars the majority of their activities and hopefully leads to the complete abolition of the program. HB 899 is a step in limiting their capabilities, but I would take it further. Additionally, we need to expand people’s options to be able to vote. A few things that I would like to see implemented are: increase early voting opportunities, expansion of vote by mail by also allowing ballots postmarked to count after election day, automatic voter registration, and same-day voter registration. I would also like to see voting day become a holiday, allowing more people to participate if they choose. There are plenty of quality checks that happen when casting ballots. Ballot curing, etc. If those that deny and decry the process participated in one day of poll watching or poll working, I think it could do a lot to dispel many people’s doubts on the process as a whole.
Campaign Priorities Q: Please list the three (3) key issues of your campaign in order of urgency. GS: Housing, Healthcare, and Economic Justice Q: Why is your top priority the most urgent issue for your constituents? GS: We are facing an affordability crisis in our country. I myself am a renter and cannot even see a future where home ownership is achievable. I am just one of many struggling to achieve that goal. So many of us are being priced out of our areas and hit with higher costs across the board. Without alleviating one of the largest pressures on Americans today, we won't be able to give members of the community the breathing space to be able to tackle broader issues.
Community Engagement & Accountability Q: How will you remain accessible and accountable to constituents if elected? GS: The majority of the money I have raised is through small donor donations and grass root progressive organizations. One way that I will remain, accountable to my constituents is by them withholding donations and not offering support for reelection campaigns. Q: How do you plan to work with grassroots and community organizations? GS: I believe the best course of action is to expand my community presence by enhancing the services provided by my office. To ensure our vulnerable community members have access to resources through other partnered organizations, I’ve established an immigration liaison. Additionally, I’ll continue to maintain working relationships like Indivisible by attending large organization initiatives and keeping my constituents informed about opportunities to get involved. Movements begin from the ground up, and we must ensure our members are well informed to attend municipal meetings and advocate for the causes they care most about. Building a country that works for everyone requires collective effort.
Endorsements & Transparency Q: What organizations or individuals have endorsed your campaign? GS: Asian American Advocacy Fund, Georgia Working Families Party, Georgia Conservation Voters. A complete list can be found on my website. The link will be provided below. Q: Please provide links to any published endorsements (if available). GS: https://www.sanchezforgeorgia.com/endorsements Q: Do you accept campaign contributions from corporate PACs, Big Tech, cryptocurrency interests, or major political advocacy organizations such as AIPAC? Why or why not? GS: The vast majority of our contributions are small-dollar donors and will continue to be. We rely on talking to progressives about our campaign and why it's important to contribute, as well as members of the community. We don’t host big-ticket fundraisers, but instead host grassroots-funded fundraisers with the community. Q: How much cash-on-hand does your campaign currently have? GS: About $32~ Q: Please list your five largest contributors. GS: n/a Q: Provide links to any pledges you have signed at the request of other organizations. GS: I am unable to accept pledges while in legislative session.
Georgia Public Service Commission District 5

Energy Future Q: What should Georgia’s energy mix look like over the next 10–20 years, and what role should renewable energy play? CC: While GA Power likes to brag about their mix including renewables like solar, the reality is we are still too heavily reliant on coal and gas. Over the next two decades, the bulk of our new energy construction should shift to renewables, with solar being the dominant form of new energy production. Solar is now often cheaper, and GA's solar coverage means we are highly underdeveloped for where we could be. Coal and gas plants currently in operation will stay in play for awhile, but eventually we should be reducing our dependence on them. AP: Over the next 10–20 years, Georgia should move toward an energy mix that is more diverse, more affordable, more reliable and much cleaner. That means a system with a strong backbone of reliability resources, but with a much larger share of solar, battery storage, energy efficiency, and other renewable energy than we have today. Georgia Power’s approved 2025 IRP has less than 10 percent of that and by adding more renewable and storage resources alongside other capacity and customer programs, which shows this transition is both practical and can be as reliable Renewable energy should play a major and growing role in that mix—not as a side option, but as a core part of Georgia’s long-term strategy. Solar in particular should be central for Georgia, paired with battery storage so we can capture low-cost power and use it when demand is higher. Nationally, the EIA reported that solar and battery storage were expected to lead new U.S. generating capacity additions in 2025, and Georgia’s own planning documents include additional solar and storage resources, as well as programs for customer-sited solar and storage. My view is that the PSC should pursue an energy mix with five priorities: keep the grid reliable, lower long-term costs, reduce exposure to fuel-price volatility, protect communities from pollution, and make sure growth does not get pushed onto residential ratepayers. That means expanding renewables in a disciplined way, investing in storage and grid modernization, and treating energy efficiency as a real resource—not an afterthought. Intervenor testimony in the 2025 IRP docket also argued Georgia should be more ambitious on efficiency, weatherization, heat pumps, and customer-sited solar and storage, especially to reduce bill impacts on vulnerable households. So my answer is this: Georgia’s future energy mix should not be locked into the old model of expensive, centralized power alone. It should be a balanced portfolio where renewable energy plays a leading role, backed by storage, smarter planning, and strong oversight. That is how we build a cleaner, more resilient, and more affordable energy future for Georgia families. Decentralization of power for rooftop, balcony, community and virtual power should be available and incentivized. And that is consistent with my broader message: the future of energy belongs to you.
Utility Oversight Q: How will you balance the interests of utility companies with the need to protect ratepayers? CC: No one is arguing for GA Power to take loses, and they are in fact allowed to make a profit by law. However, there is a difference between a respectable and healthy profit, and the RECORD profits that GA Power has been making in recent years. At the same time, nearly all of their new plant operations have been approved with very little deep examination on potential harms to surrounding communities. We must work to ensure that GA ratepayers are paying fair but balanced rates, and that communities are protected from potentially deeper environmental harms. I will bring that perspective to all decisions that come before the commission. AP: At the Georgia Public Service Commission, I will restore that balance by putting accountability, transparency, and fairness at the center of every decision. First, I will lower excessive profits and tie returns to performance. Right now, utilities are allowed a high return on equity (ROE) regardless of outcomes. I will push to reduce that ROE and ensure profits are earned only when utilities deliver reliable, affordable service—not simply because they spend more. Second, I will stop rubber-stamping rate increases. Every rate request must be fully justified and independently scrutinized. If costs are driven by mismanagement, delays, or unnecessary projects, those should not be passed on to ratepayers. Third, I will ensure fairness in who pays. Large energy users—like data centers—must pay the full cost of the infrastructure they require, so everyday Georgians are not subsidizing corporate demand. Fourth, I will align utility incentives with long-term affordability. Utilities should be rewarded for lowering costs, improving efficiency, and investing in clean, cost-effective energy—not just for expanding capital projects that increase bills. Finally, I will bring the public into the process. Decisions at the PSC should not happen behind closed doors. I will ensure real transparency, plain-language communication, and accessible public engagement, so Georgians can see how decisions are made and who they benefit. This is how we strike the right balance: fair to utilities, but firmly on the side of the people. The future of energy belongs to Georgians—and I will fight to make sure their interests come first every time.
Rising Energy Costs Q: What specific actions would you take to address rising electricity bills for Georgia residents? CC: I would want to see a reexamination of recent rate and fee approvals, but barring that, I would look critically at any future rate or fee increase requests. At the same time, I would love to see more investment into programs designed to relieve that rate burden on households least able to endure any increases, including low-income and senior households. AP: At the Georgia Public Service Commission, I would take the following specific actions: 1. Lower the Return on Equity (ROE). At 12 percent, Georgia Power is earning excessively high guaranteed profits, even as families struggle. I will push to reduce the allowed ROE so that profits are fair—not excessive—and directly tied to performance. That alone can put downward pressure on bills. 2. Stop Automatic Rate Increases & Strengthen Oversight. Georgia families have seen multiple rate hikes in a short period. I will vote no on unjustified increases and require utilities to prove—line by line—why any increase is necessary. If costs result from mismanagement or delays, shareholders—not ratepayers—should bear that burden. 3. Protect Customers from Cost Overruns (like Plant Vogtle). Large infrastructure projects have driven up bills. I will work to ensure that future cost overruns are not automatically passed on to customers and push for stronger financial accountability before projects are approved. 4. Expand Energy Efficiency & Bill Reduction Programs. The fastest way to lower bills is to use less energy more efficiently. I will advocate for expanded programs that help families weatherize homes, upgrade appliances, and reduce consumption—especially for low- and middle-income households. 5. Invest in Affordable Clean Energy. Solar and other renewable sources are now among the lowest-cost energy options. I will push to accelerate clean energy adoption in ways that lower long-term costs, reduce reliance on expensive fuel sources, and stabilize bills over time. 6. Increase Transparency & Public Access. Most people don’t know how their bills are decided. I will require plain-language explanations, public dashboards, and accessible hearings so Georgians can see where their money is going—and hold decision-makers accountable. 7. Create Targeted Relief for Vulnerable Households. I will support stronger protections for seniors, working families and small businesses, including bill assistance programs and fairer rate structures that don’t disproportionately burden those least able to pay. At its core, this is about shifting power back to the people, and I will fight to make sure our utility bill reflects fairness, accountability, and a system that finally works in our favor.
Data Centers & Ratepayer Impact Q: Georgia is experiencing rapid growth in energy-intensive data centers. How will you ensure that the cost of infrastructure and increased demand is not shifted onto residential ratepayers? CC: I would do everything in my power, in working with my fellow commissioners and the state legislature, to ensure that the rate scheme for data centers is constructed in such a way as to prevent "slippage". As it stands now, GA Power and the Data Centers will say they are paying their fair share, but it's too easy to slip the hidden costs of further energy production and other costs on to regular residential taxpayers. We must make sure their are guardrails in place to prevent residential customers from eventually holding the bag for the massive investments that GA Power is planning on to accommodate the needs of these centers. AP: Georgia’s growth in data centers presents an opportunity—but also a risk if we don’t get the policy right. My position is simple: growth should not come at the expense of working families. At the Georgia Public Service Commission, I would take these specific actions to protect residential ratepayers: 1. Require Data Centers to Pay the True Cost of Service. Data centers are among the most energy-intensive customers on the grid. I will require cost-of-service-based rates and special tariffs so they fully pay for the infrastructure, transmission upgrades, and generation needed to serve them—not subsidized by residential customers. As an alternative, data centers should use approved renewable applications to power their systems. 2. Establish “No Cost Shift” Protections. I will push for formal policies that guarantee zero cost shifting—meaning any new infrastructure built to serve large-load customers must be directly assigned to those customers, not spread across everyday ratepayers. 3. Upfront Infrastructure Contributions. Before new data centers are approved, utilities should require upfront financial commitments (or long-term contracts) from those companies to cover grid upgrades. If a project doesn’t materialize or underperforms, ratepayers should not be left holding the bill. 4. Performance-Based Agreements. I will support agreements that tie data center rates to actual usage, reliability impacts and long-term commitments. If they scale back or leave, they must still cover the costs of the infrastructure built for them. 5. Align Growth with Clean, Affordable Energy. We should require large-load customers to bring or procure clean energy resources as part of their projects. This reduces strain on the grid and helps avoid new costs being pushed onto existing customers. 6. Transparency and Public Accountability. These deals are often negotiated out of public view. I will require full transparency so Georgians can see who is benefiting, what commitments are being made, and whether the public interest is being protected. 7. Plan for Long-Term Grid Impact. Rapid demand growth must be matched with smart, equitable planning. I will ensure that long-term energy planning prioritizes grid reliability, affordability, and fairness, not just corporate expansion. This is about drawing a clear line: Georgia can welcome innovation and economic development—but not on the backs of its residents. The future of energy belongs to us, and I will make sure that as our state grows, but that ratepayers bills don’t grow with it.
Large Energy Users Q: Do you support requiring large energy users (such as data centers) to pay the full cost of the infrastructure needed to serve them? Why or why not? CC: When new projects are designed purely for the expressed purposes of serving these new business customers, it's more than fair to expect them to pay the all or the vast majority of these costs, since they will be the primary beneficiaries. While there may be an equation that needs to be worked out if some power will also be used for residential, if a project is created be data centers almost entirely in mind, it's fair for them to bare the lion's share of that burden. AP: Yes, I strongly support requiring large energy users, including data centers, to pay the full cost of the infrastructure needed to serve them. My position is grounded in a simple principle: cost causation should equal cost responsibility. If a new, energy-intensive customer drives the need for new generation, transmission lines, or grid upgrades, those costs should be borne by that customer—not shifted onto residential ratepayers. Right now, without strong guardrails, there is a real risk that rapid load growth from data centers could lead to higher bills for everyday Georgians. That is not fair, and it is not sustainable. Families should not be subsidizing billion-dollar corporations’ energy demand. Requiring full cost responsibility also protects the long-term health of our energy system. It ensures that growth is intentional, financially sound, and aligned with grid capacity, rather than speculative expansion that leaves ratepayers exposed if projects don’t deliver as promised. I would also pair this requirement with long-term contracts, upfront infrastructure contributions, and enforceable commitments so that if a data center scales back or leaves, Georgia families are not left paying for stranded assets. We can absolutely welcome economic development and innovation in Georgia—but we must do it the right way. The future of energy belongs to Georgians, and that means building a system where growth pays its own way—and people come first.
Major Projects & Accountability Q: How should the PSC handle cost overruns or delays from large utility projects? Should utilities face penalties? CC: The PSC has been far to lax in simply signing off on overages and passing those costs on to rate-payers. The PSC must do more to hold GA Power and it's partners accountable for delays and make them feel more of the pain from those overruns and delays, hopefully incentivizing them to stay much closer to original promises and plans. AP: Large utility projects must be managed with discipline and accountability—because when they go over budget or fall behind schedule, Georgia families feel it on their monthly bills. At the Georgia Public Service Commission, I believe the standard should be clear: ratepayers should not be the default backstop for utility mismanagement. Yes—utilities should face real consequences for cost overruns and delays. Here’s how I would approach it: 1. Shift Risk Back to Shareholders. If a project runs over budget due to poor planning, mismanagement, or avoidable delays, those costs should be absorbed by the utility and its investors—not automatically passed on to customers. 2. Enforce Performance-Based Penalties. I support financial penalties for missed deadlines and excessive overruns, especially when utilities fail to meet agreed-upon benchmarks. If performance falls short, profits should be reduced. 3. Cap Recoverable Costs. The PSC should establish clear cost caps upfront. Beyond that threshold, utilities should not be guaranteed recovery from ratepayers unless they can prove extraordinary, unavoidable circumstances. 4. Tie Profits to Performance. Utilities should only earn strong returns when they deliver projects on time, on budget and in the public interest. That includes revisiting and lowering excessive return on equity (ROE) when performance does not justify it. 5. Increase Transparency and Independent Oversight. Major projects should have independent audits, regular public reporting, and real-time transparency so problems are caught early—not after costs have already ballooned. 6. Learn Before Approving the Next Project. Before approving future large-scale projects, the PSC must evaluate past performance. A utility with a track record of overruns should face stricter scrutiny and conditions. This isn’t about punishing utilities—it’s about restoring balance and fairness. Georgia can invest in critical infrastructure, but it must do so responsibly, and that means your utility bill should never be a blank check for mistakes you didn’t make.
Clean Energy & Climate Q: What role, if any, should the PSC play in addressing climate change and expanding clean energy? CC: The PSC can and should use it's power of the pulpit to push and encourage GA Power and other utilities in the state to work towards a cleaner energy matrix, and acknowledge that climate change is real and a primary reason driving this need. AP: The Georgia Public Service Commission has a direct and essential role in addressing climate change—because its decisions determine how energy is generated, what infrastructure gets built, and how much Georgians pay for it. For me, this isn’t just an environmental issue—it’s an economic and public health issue. Climate change is already impacting extreme weather, grid reliability, and long-term costs. The PSC has both the authority and the responsibility to act. Here’s the role I believe the PSC should play: 1. Lead the Transition to Affordable Clean Energy. Clean energy—especially solar—is now one of the lowest-cost sources of power. The PSC should accelerate its adoption in a way that lowers bills over time, reduces fuel volatility and strengthens energy independence. 2. Prioritize Cost-Effective Planning. Through decisions like Integrated Resource Plans (IRPs), the PSC determines Georgia’s energy mix. I will ensure those plans prioritize least-cost, lowest-risk options, including renewables, storage, and energy efficiency—not just large, expensive projects. 3. Expand Energy Efficiency and Demand Reduction. The cheapest energy is the energy we don’t use. The PSC should expand programs that help families and businesses reduce consumption and lower their bills, while also cutting emissions. 4. Protect Communities and Advance Environmental Justice. The burden of pollution and high energy costs falls hardest on low-income and rural communities. The PSC must ensure that clean energy investments reach all Georgians, not just those who can afford them. 5. Align Economic Growth with Sustainability. As Georgia grows—especially with energy-intensive industries like data centers—the PSC should require that new demand is met with clean, responsibly planned energy, so growth does not increase pollution or costs for residents. 6. Increase Transparency and Public Engagement. Climate and energy decisions are often made in highly technical processes. I will make sure the public has clear, accessible information and a real voice in shaping Georgia’s energy future. The PSC doesn’t set climate policy in isolation—but it is one of the most powerful levers we have to drive cleaner, more affordable, and more reliable energy. The future of energy belongs to you—and that future must be cleaner, more equitable, and built to last.
Consumer Protection Q: How will you advocate for low-income and vulnerable ratepayers? CC: Energy Equity should be a part of the conversation in all decisions around rates and fees and new plans. The PSC should work with all of the utilities and the Legislature to beef up existing programs for vulnerable communities and establish new programs to ensure no household goes without power and/or gas just because of economic hardship. AP: Advocating for low-income and vulnerable ratepayers means making sure that the Georgia Public Service Commission prioritizes affordability, access, and fairness in every decision—not as an afterthought, but as a core responsibility. 1. Lower Bills at the Source. The most effective way to help vulnerable households is to reduce overall energy costs. I will push to lower excessive return on equity (ROE), reject unjustified rate increases, and ensure that large corporate users pay their fair share—so costs are not shifted onto those least able to afford them. 2. Expand Bill Assistance and Protections. I will advocate for stronger and more accessible bill assistance programs, including protections against disconnections during extreme weather and more flexible payment options for families facing hardship. 3. Invest in Energy Efficiency for Those Who Need It Most. Low-income households often live in homes that are less energy efficient, leading to higher bills. I will push for expanded programs that provide free or low-cost weatherization, appliance upgrades, and energy-saving improvements, helping families lower their bills long-term. 4. Ensure Fair Rate Structures. Rate design matters. I will work to ensure that pricing structures do not disproportionately burden low-income households, and instead promote fairness and stability in monthly bills. 5. Increase Access to Clean Energy. Clean energy should not be a luxury. I will support programs that expand community solar and shared energy solutions, so renters and lower-income families can benefit from lower-cost renewable energy. 6. Bring the Public Into the Process. Too often, the voices of vulnerable communities are missing from PSC decisions. I will ensure accessible hearings, plain-language communication, and outreach in underserved communities, so people can advocate for themselves and be heard. This is about dignity as much as it is about policy. No one should have to choose between keeping the lights on and meeting basic needs. I will fight to make sure that future includes everyone, especially those who have been overlooked for far too long.
Independence & Ethics Q: How will you maintain independence from the utilities you are tasked with regulating? CC: I will operate from a place of transparency and clarity regarding my relationship with the utilities I would be regulating. I would refuse donations from regulated entities and their officers/affiliates, and I would ensure that my schedule of meetings involving these entities are public and transparent as much as possible. AP: Maintaining independence from the utilities I regulate starts with a clear commitment: this role is about serving the people of Georgia—not the companies before the commission. At the Georgia Public Service Commission, I will protect that independence through strong ethics, transparency, and accountability: 1. Refuse Conflicted Contributions. I do not believe regulated utilities should fund the campaigns of the officials who oversee them. I support strict limits—and ultimately a prohibition—on contributions from utilities and their affiliated PACs, and I will not accept support that compromises public trust. 2. Full Transparency in All Interactions. I will make sure that meetings with utilities, lobbyists, and industry representatives are publicly disclosed, with clear records so Georgians can see who is influencing decisions and when. 3. Clear Ethical Boundaries. I will uphold strong recusal standards where appropriate and avoid any relationships—financial or otherwise—that could create even the appearance of bias. 4. Data-Driven, Public-Interest Decisions. My decisions will be based on evidence, independent analysis, and the public interest—not pressure from utilities or political influence. If a proposal is not in the best interest of ratepayers, I will vote no—period. 5. Strengthen Public EngagementIndependence isn’t just about distancing from utilities—it’s also about being closer to the people. I will prioritize community input, consumer advocacy, and accessible hearings so that everyday Georgians have a real voice in the process. 6. Ongoing Accountability to VotersI will maintain open communication, regular reporting, and accessible updates so the public can hold me accountable for every decision I make. Independence is not just a promise—it’s a practice. And I will bring that discipline to every vote, every meeting, and every decision.
Campaign Contributions Q: What is your policy on accepting contributions from utilities, corporate PACs, or major industry groups (including energy, tech, or cryptocurrency interests)? Please disclose any such contributions. CC: To-date, my campaign has been fueled purely on individual donations, and I would refuse and/or return any donations from utilities and utility-affiliated or backed PACs and groups. AP: My position is rooted in one principle: the people of Georgia deserve a Public Service Commission that is independent, transparent, and accountable to them—not to the industries it regulates. At the Georgia Public Service Commission, commissioners make decisions that directly impact utility profits and household bills. Because of that, I believe we must hold ourselves to the highest ethical standard. My policy is clear: I do not believe utilities or entities directly regulated by the PSC should financially influence the commissioners who oversee them. I support strict limits—and ultimately a prohibition—on contributions from regulated utilities and their affiliated PACs. I am committed to full transparency, including publicly disclosing all contributions and ensuring voters can easily see who is supporting my campaign. On corporate PACs and major industry groups (including energy, tech, or cryptocurrency): I believe any contributions must be evaluated through the lens of conflict of interest and public trust. If accepting a contribution could reasonably call into question my independence or decision-making, I will not accept it. Disclosure: I am committed to publishing a clear, accessible, and regularly updated list of all donors so that Georgians can hold me accountable. My campaign is focused on building support from people—not powerful interests. This role requires more than technical knowledge—it requires public trust. And I will protect that trust by ensuring my decisions are guided by what is right for Georgia families, every single time. The future of energy belongs to you—and that includes having a commissioner who answers only to Georgians.
Top Priorities Q: What are your top three (3) priorities if elected? CC: 1. Rate Accountability & Transparent Oversight - I'll ask the tough questions utilities don't want to answer—because I understand their technical studies and financial projections. 2. Fair Cost Allocation for Data Centers & Large Users - I’ll protect residential and small business ratepayers while supporting responsible economic development. Big Tech shouldn't raise the power bill for families. 3. Cost Effective Renewables - I want to accelerate renewable energy deployment. In many cases, solar and wind are now competitive or less expensive than traditional energy generation. Let's use that to Georgia's advantage. AP: If elected to the Georgia Public Service Commission, my top three priorities are grounded in one goal: making the system work for the people of Georgia—not just for utility profits. 1. Lower Costs and Protect Ratepayers. My priority is to bring down rising electricity bills starts with lowering the excessive return on equity (ROE) that utilities are allowed to earn and rejecting unjustified rate increases. I will also ensure that large energy users—like data centers—pay their full share, so everyday families are not subsidizing corporate demand. 2. The PSC must stop offering carte blanche permissions to Georgia Power. I will enforce stronger monitoring, require full transparency, and ensure that cost overruns, delays, and mismanagement are not passed on to ratepayers. Utilities should only profit when they deliver results—on time, on budget, and in the public interest. 3. Build an Affordable, Clean, and Reliable Energy Future. Georgia can lead in clean, cost-effective energy while improving reliability. I will prioritize investments in solar, energy efficiency, and modern grid infrastructure that lower long-term costs and reduce the need for constant rate hikes—while also addressing environmental and public health concerns. At the core of all three priorities is a simple belief: The future of energy belongs to Georgians—and I will fight to make sure citizens' voices, wallets and future are protected.
Why You? Q: Why are you the best candidate for this role? CC: I believe my professional and educational background make me better suited for this role than my opponents. Not only does my engineering background give me an edge in understanding the technical aspects of the kind of proposals that come before the PSC, but my professional experience as an IP attorney brought me in contact s with the technologies that are at the heart of so much of the expected demand growth projected by GA Power, and I will ask the right questions in order to interrogate those proposals and plans. I understood again exactly what it means when every penny counts. I am not making policy decisions in the abstract. I know these costs affect real people, and I will never forget that. AP: I am the best candidate for this role because I bring a combination of real-world experience, policy advocacy, and a deep commitment to putting people first, at a time when Georgia families need strong, independent leadership on the Georgia Public Service Commission. I have spent over two decades as a business owner, more than a decade as an environmental sustainability consultant, and I serve as a university professor focused on business, energy systems, and strategy. That means I understand both sides of this equation: how utilities operate and how policies impact everyday people. But what sets me apart is how I use that knowledge: to advocate for working families, not corporations. I am running because I have seen firsthand what happens when the commission fails to act—when families show up asking for relief, for fairness, for environmental responsibility, and are ignored. That is unacceptable. I will bring independent oversight, stronger monitoring of utilities, and a willingness to say no when proposals are not in the public interest. My platform is clear: Lower excessive return on equity (ROE), so profits are fair, not inflated Stop unjustified rate increases and protect families from rising bills Ensure data centers and large users pay their full costs—not ratepayers Invest in clean, affordable energy to lower long-term costs Make the PSC transparent and accessible so people truly have a seat at the table I am not running to maintain the status quo—I am running to transform how this commission works for the people of Georgia. The future of energy belongs to Georgians, and I have the experience, independence and courage to fight for it every single day.




